34 hosting providers bought & monitored since 2020

We may earn a commission. Rankings are set by test data, not commission rates.Affiliate DisclosureHow we test

Cloudways Vs WP Engine: Bought & Tested

Summary: WP Engine records 361ms TTFB speed, 99.9933% uptime, 27ms load handling response time, 65ms cached global TTFB and a 6.5/10 WPBench score. score. The performance data was collected between November 1, 2025 and August 29, 2026. In the same time period, Cloudways Vultr HF records 433ms TTFB, 99.9990% uptime, 291ms load handling response time, 395ms cached global TTFB and a 7.6/10 WPBench. WP Engine clearly wins on speed, load handling and global speed TTFB. WP Engine and Cloudways Vultr HF tie in the uptime test, while Cloudways Vultr HF wins the server hardware test.

Note: We are paying customers to both Cloudways and WP Engine since 2020 and our actual invoices can be seen here. Our Cloudways and WP Engine comparison follows our methodology. We have been testing all the 5 cloud providers of Cloudways. However, the Cloudways Vultr HF is priced at $16 per month, which is closest to the range of WP Engine at $27 per month. Hence, we picked Cloudways Vultr HF for comparison in this review.

Quick Verdict

MetricCloudways Vultr HFWP EngineWinner
Overall rank (of 29)#20#9WP Engine
Final score6.437.80WP Engine
TTFB (10-month avg)433ms361msWP Engine
Uptime (10-month avg)99.9990%99.9933%Cloudways and WP Engine
Load test291ms / 2.3% errors27ms / 0% errorsWP Engine
Global TTFB (cached)395ms65msWP Engine
WPBench score7.6/106.5/10Cloudways
Sites includedUnlimited (CPU/RAM bound)1Cloudways
CDN (entry plan)Paid add-on at $4.99/domainCloudflare edge cachingWP Engine
Intro price$16/mo$27/moCloudways
Visit Cloudways.comVisit WPEngine.com

Cloudways vs WP Engine: Speed

WP Engine outperforms Cloudways Vultr HF in TTFB speed with a 72ms difference.

Historically based on the last five years, Cloudways has been consistently offering the best TTFB range from 400 to 450 ms in average. However, WP Engine had a roller coaster where the TTFB might be above 500 ms. But since 2024 when they introduced the edge caching, their response time has been improved a lot and now they are much faster than any of the Cloudways Cloud providers.

WP Engine response time and uptime, November 2025 to August 2026: 361ms and 99.99%.
Cloudways Vultr HF response time and uptime, November 2025 to August 2026: 433ms and 99.99%.

Cloudways vs WP Engine: Uptime

Cloudways and WP Engine both wins with consistent uptime at 99.99%. Similar to TTFB speed, the uptime has been consistently better at Cloudways and WP Engine has improved after the 2024. WP Engine has recorded two outages in this time period and one outage lasted for 25 minutes, which is the periodic scheduled maintenance. So leaving that, the outage is just four minutes in this whole 10 months testing period. In comparison, Cloudways Vultr HF has small outages happened for four times lasting for four minutes.

Pingdom uptime log for WP Engine across the November 2025 to August 2026 window.
Pingdom uptime log for Cloudways Vultr HF across the November 2025 to August 2026 window.

Cloudways vs WP Engine: Load Handling

WP Engine wins the load handling test outright. It has recorded an average response time of 27ms with 0% errors, while Cloudways Vultr HF recorded 291ms with a 2.3% error rate. Lower the response time indicates the faster the servers are handling the bulk of visitors. WP Engine is at least 10 times faster than Cloudways Vultr HF. The major reason is that WP Engine comes with Cloudflare edge caching CDN wheras Cloudways is tested with its origin server only. To attain a similar performance, you can use the Cloudflare Enterprise CDN add-on for $4.99 per domain. And through this way, it can also handle the response time at lesser than 50ms.

Loader.io load test for WP Engine: 27ms average response, 0% errors at 100 concurrent users.
Loader.io load test result for Cloudways Vultr HF at 100 concurrent users.

Cloudways vs WP Engine: Global TTFB

WP Engine dominates Cloudways in Global TTFB test. It has recorded an average global TTFB of 65 ms measured from 40 global locations, whereas Cloudways Vultr HF has recorded 395 ms. Again, due to the bundled CDN offering of WP Engine, it has been able to offer the highest, the fastest possible global TTFB among any of the 35 hosts we have tested so far.

SpeedVitals cached global TTFB for WP Engine: 65ms average across 40 worldwide locations.
Cloudways DigitalOcean Standard warm-cache global TTFB across 40 locations

Cloudways vs WP Engine: Hardware Server Test

Cloudways is the real winner in Hardware Server test. It has recorded 7.6/10 against WP Engine’s 6.5/10. The higher the score indicates the servers can handle uncached requests faster, like our WordPress backend dashboard, LMS or WooCommerce stores. WP Engine achieves a better score in the above test through its CDN whereas, in this test, the real origin server power is tested, and Cloudways wins hands down.

WPBenchmark server hardware result for Cloudways Vultr HF, scoring 7.6 out of 10.
WPBenchmark server hardware result for WP Engine, scoring 6.5 out of 10.

Cloudways vs WP Engine: Features

FeatureCloudways Vultr HFWP Engine
Websites includedUnlimited (bound by CPU and RAM)1
Monthly visitsNot metered25,000
Automated backupsDailyDaily, 30-day retention
Email hostingPaid add-onNot offered
CDNAdd-on (Cloudflare Enterprise, $4.99/domain)Cloudflare edge caching included
Staging environmentYesStaging, development and production
Free migrationYesYes
CachingBreeze plugin, unlimited sitesBuilt-in page and object caching
Control panelCloudways custom panelWP Engine User Portal
DDoS protectionCloud provider levelLayer 3+4
Trial / guarantee3-day free trial, no contract60-day money-back guarantee
Support24/7 live chat24/7 live chat
Avatar photo
Mohan Raj

Mohan Raj is the founder of Hostingstep.com. He reviews web hosting providers by purchasing hosting accounts with his own funds and testing them 24/7, 365 days a year. He runs 525,600 performance tests a year, covering TTFB speed, uptime, load handling, Core Web Vitals and hardware benchmarks. With that data, he writes transparent hosting reviews with publicly verifiable performance data, giving the utmost confidence for Hostingstep.com visitors to find their ideal hosting choices.