In this post, let’s discuss the fastest managed WordPress hosting services for 2022. Based on field data, we’ve listed this fast managed hosting services for WordPress.
Contents
Fastest Managed WordPress Hosting
1. Templ
Based on our test, Templ.io is the overall fastest Managed WordPress hosting. Templ hosting is powered by Google Cloud and sub-powered with Google CDN and DNS. Templ is the only host to offer such a combination of auto-scalable hosting solutions. The company offers 24/7 customer support and offers free site speed optimization when moving your sites to them.
Server Response Time
I have my site on the Templ platform, and I test its speed constantly using the Pingdom tool. According to my last test, my Templ site recorded an average server response time of 309 ms, and that’s a great speed for sure.
Uptime
As per my last uptime test performed on my Templ site, the site recorded an exceptionally good uptime of 100% without any outage. This makes the service very reliable.
Load Testing
I tested the load handling capacity of my Templ site by sending 1000 concurrent traffic in 1 minute to my site and monitoring how it responded. My Templ site recorded 33 ms in Clients Per Test (1000 Clients in 1 Minute), 32 ms in Maintain Client Load (500 Clients in 1 Minute), and 71 ms in Maintain Client Load (1000 Clients in 1 Minute).
Going by the results, it’s not hard to say that Templ has an extremely robust load handling and can efficiently handle any traffic spikes. You can largely count on this platform for hosting high traffic sites.
Global TTFB
According to my last Global TTFB test on my Templ site, the site recorded an average of 353.69 ms with brilliant TTFB across all the places. My site had the lowest TTFB of 59.77 ms in Dallas and the highest TTFB of 690.87 ms in Bangalore. Hence, you can largely rely on this platform for sites that get their traffic for multiple global locations.
Core Web Vitals
As per my last Core Web Vitals test, my Templ site recorded a ‘Largest Contentful Paint’ of 0.629s, a ‘Total Blocking Time’ of 0.000s, and a ‘Cumulative Layout Shift’ of 0. Based on the test results, Templ has excellent Core Web Vitals, and if you host your site on this platform, your site can certainly get a lot of help when it comes to improving user experience.
Check our Templ Review or get started with a $30 free credits Templ Coupon to host your sites on the fastest managed WordPress hosting on the planet.
2. Cloudways
Cloudways is another fast managed hosting service for WordPress. Basically a cloud hosting, Cloudways allows you to host your sites through five different cloud providers.
Server Response Time
I tested the server response time of my site hosted on Cloudways, and the site recorded an average server response time of 309 ms. Hence, you can imagine how blazing fast my site is, and you can surely rely on Cloudways for its speed.
Uptime
When I tested the uptime of my Cloudways site, my site recorded an uptime of 99.99%. There were 2 outages and 3 minutes of downtime. However, 99.99% uptime is a pretty reliable uptime for sure.
Load Testing
To check the load handling capacity of Cloudways, I sent 1000 concurrent traffic to my Cloudways site and observed the way it handled the traffic. I must say the site responded very well and recorded 10 ms in Clients Per Test (1000 Clients in 1 Minute), 168 ms in Maintain Client Load (500 Clients in 1 Minute), and 268 ms in Maintain Client Load (1000 Clients in 1 Minute). As per my observations, I can say that Cloudways can be largely relied upon for its Load handling capacity.
Global TTFB
Next, it’s time to check how good the Cloudways TTFB is across multiple global locations. I pinged my Cloudways site from ten global locations and monitored the way it responded. The site recorded an average TTFB of 390.15 ms with a decent TTFB across all ten places.
The site recorded the lowest TTFB in New York with 14.47 ms and the highest TTFB in Singapore with 727.44 ms. Hence, you can largely count on Cloudways for its Global TTFB.
Core Web Vitals
When I tested the Core Web Vitals of my Cloudways site, it recorded a ‘Largest Contentful Pain’ of 0.583s, a ‘Total Blocking Time’ of 0.000s, and a ‘Cumulative Layout Shift’ of 0. Based on the test results, Cloudways certainly has decent Core Web Vitals, and any site hosted on this platform can deliver an excellent user experience for sure.
Check Cloudways.com or look for Cloudways Promo Code to get $25 free credits for the first month.
3. Rocket
Rocket.net is the Cloudflare CDN powered Fast WordPress hosting. By default, all the sites are powered by Cloudflare CDN with edge caching. Thus it offers a sub-100ms response time from any part of the globe. You can choose from any of the 20+ global data centers to host your sites.
Server Response Time
According to my last server response time test performed on my Rocket.net site, my site recorded an average server response time of 268 ms. I must admit that Rocket is the fastest of all the Managed WordPress hosting services. Rocket sites are lightning-fast.
Uptime
As per my recent uptime test on my Rocket.net site, my site recorded an uptime of 100%. Most importantly, the site maintained a consistent uptime throughout the testing period without any outage and downtime.
Load Testing
Now, it is time to find out if Rocket.net is capable of handling high traffic. In my recent Load testing on my Rocket.net site, my site recorded 16 ms in Clients Per Test (1000 Clients in 1 Minute), 60 ms in Maintain Client Load (500 Clients in 1 Minute), and 14 ms in Maintain Client Load (1000 Clients in 1 Minute).
Going by the results, Rocket has an exceptionally good load handling capacity, and sites hosted on this platform will continue to be up and running even during the worst traffic spikes.
Global TTFB
So far, so good, but how good is Rocket.net in terms of Global TTFB? To find this, I tested the Global TTFB of my Rocket.net site, wherein I pinged the site from as many as ten global locations.
The test results were fascinating, and the site recorded an average TTFB of 158.28 ms with excellent TTFB across all the global locations. The site recorded the lowest TTFB in Frankfurt with 29.13 ms and the highest TTFB in Bangalore with 358.91 ms. Hence, it wouldn’t be wrong to say that Rocket is an ideal platform for sites that rely on multiple global locations for traffic.
Core Web Vitals
I checked the Core Web Vitals of Rocket and found them very reliable. According to my last Core Web Vitals test on my Rocket site, my site recorded a ‘Largest Contentful Paint’ of 0.775s, a ‘Total Blocking Time’ of 0.000s, and a ‘Cumulative Layout Shift’ of 0. Hence, Rocket.net has great Core Web Vitals, and sites hosted on this platform will do extremely well in terms of user experience.
4. Kinsta
Kinsta is the fastest managed hosting for WordPress that requires high computing power. Kinsta uses Google C2 VMs, which is the fastest VM designed by Google Cloud. You can choose from any of the 24 data centers across the globe. Kinsta plans start at $30/month with 25,000 traffic limits.
Server Response Time
I tested the server response time of my Kinsta site using the Pingdom tool, and my site recorded an average server response time of 360 ms. Hence, Kisnta has exceptionally good server response time, and sites hosted on this platform have extremely fast load times.
Uptime
As far as the Kinsta uptime goes, it is pretty reliable. As per my last uptime test performed on my Kinsta site, my site recorded an uptime of 99.99% with 2 outages and downtime of 2 minutes. Besides, there haven’t been any uptime issues in this platform so far. Hence, you can completely rely on Kinsta for its uptime.
Load Testing
I tested the Kinsta load handling capacity by sending 1000 concurrent traffic in 1 minute to my Kinsta site, and my site recorded 33 ms in the Clients Per Test (1000 Clients in 1 minute). Hence, the platform can handle high traffic. Further, many high traffic sites have run smoothly on Kinsta over the years without issues.
Global TTFB
To check how good the Kinsta TTFB is across different global locations, I performed the Global TTFB test on my Kinsta site, wherein I pinged my site from ten global locations. My site scored an average TTFB of 496.86 ms with good TTFB across all the locations.
The site recorded the lowest TTFB in Dallas with 91.06 ms and the highest TTFB of 944.32 ms in Bangalore. Even though there is no denying that the TTFB is a bit high in Bangalore, overall, Kinsta has a reliable Global TTFB.
Core Web Vitals
It would be interesting to understand how well Kinsta can help sites deliver a good user experience. To understand this, I tested the Core Web Vitals of my Kinsta site. My site recorded a ‘Largest Contentful Paint’ of 0.787s, a ‘Total blocking Time’ of 0.000s, and a ‘Cumulative Layout Shift’ of 0. Based on the test results, Kinsta can surely provide sites with a lot of help in terms of user experience.
Read our Kinsta Review to know the other aspects like customer support, features, and the dashboard.
5. WP Engine
WP Engine is an affordable, fast hosting for WordPress. This host is not as powerful as Templ, but it comes affordable for $100/month; you can host 10 WordPress sites. WP Engine offers StackPath CDN, which is one of the fastest CDN in the North American region.
Server Response Time
To check the server response time of WP Engine, I monitored the server response time of my WP Engine site using the Pingdom tool, and my site recorded an average server response time of 374 ms. This is a brilliant speed for sure.
Uptime
As far as the WP Engine uptime goes, I tested the uptime of my WP Engine site, and the site recorded an uptime of 99.99% with 1 outage and downtime of 6 minutes. However, 99.99% is certainly a reliable uptime, and further, WP Engine hasn’t had any uptime issues over the years.
Load Testing
To find out the load handling ability of WP Engine, I performed load testing on my WP Engine site. I sent 1000 concurrent traffic in 1 minute to the site and monitored how it responded. During the test, I sent concurrent traffic of 1000 clients in 1 minute to the site. My WP Engine site recorded 40 ms in the Clients Per Test (1000 Clients in 1 Minute), reflecting good traffic handling.
Global TTFB
It is important to check WP Engine Global TTFB, and to do it; I tested the Global TTFB of my WP Engine site by pinging the site from ten global locations. My site recorded an average TTFB of 462.05 ms with decent TTFB across all ten locations.
The site recorded the lowest TTFB of 123.33 ms in New York and the highest TTFB of 916.52 ms in Bangalore. Hence, you can certainly rely on WP Engine for sites that target multiple global locations.
Core Web Vitals
I tested the Core Web Vitals of WP Engine to understand how much help sites hosted on WP Engine could get from this platform regarding user experience. My WP Engine site recorded a ‘Largest Contentful Paint’ of 0.601s, a ‘Total Blocking Time’ of 0.000s, and a ‘Cumulative Layout Shift’ of 0.
Based on the test results, I can say that WP Engine has excellent Core Web Vitals, and sites hosted on it will deliver a brilliant user experience.
6. Nexcess
Nexcess is the best hosting for agencies. When you host more sites, the prices will be much lower than shared hosting. They also include email hosting, free auto-scaling, and inhouse developed CDN with global edge locations. You can get started using our Nexcess Coupon Code and enjoy 50% OFF on all plans for 6 months.
Server Response Time
I tested the server response time of my Nexcess site using the Pingdom tool, and my site recorded an average server response time of 374 ms. This is certainly a decent server response time, and sites hosted on this platform can expect a very fast loading speed.
Uptime
When I tested the uptime of my Nexcess site, my site recorded an uptime of 100% without any outage and downtime. This makes it extremely reliable.
Load Testing
It is important to find out if Nexcess can’t be counted on for high traffic sites. To understand this, I performed load testing on my Nexcess site by sending concurrent traffic of 1000 clients in one minute to the site.
After that, I closely monitored how it handled the traffic, and my site recorded 66 ms in Clients Per Test (1000 Clients in 1 Minute), 182 ms in Maintain Client Load (500 Clients in 1 Minute), and 398 ms in Maintain Client Load (1000 Clients in 1 Minute). Based on the results, Nexcess is a very dependable hosting platform for high traffic sites.
Global TTFB
I tested the Global TTFB of Nexcess goes by pinging my Nexcess site from 10 different global locations. My Nexcess site responded pretty well, and it recorded an average TTFB of 544.15 ms with a decent TTFB in most of the locations.
The site recorded the lowest TTFB in Dallas with 137.15 ms and the highest TTFB in Sydney with 1.25 seconds. Overall, Nexcess has reliable Global TTFB and can be counted on for sites that depend on multiple global locations for traffic.
Core Web Vitals
It’s time to check the Nexcess Core Web Vitals, and this is important to determine how helpful the platform can be in terms of user experience. As I tested the Core Web Vitals of my Nexcess site, my site recorded a ‘Largest Contentful Paint’ of 0.654s, a ‘Total Blocking time’ of 0.000s, and a ‘Cumulative Layout Shift’ of 0.000s.
Based on the test results, Nexcess has decent Core Web Vitals, and sites hosted on this platform can benefit greatly from improving their user experience.
7. DreamPress
DreamPress is a decent choice with average speed. However, we don’t recommend this host as there is no real value for money.
Server Response Time
I tested the server response time of my DreamPress site using the Pingdom tool, and the site recorded an average server response time of 394 ms. This is a decent server response time, and sites hosted on this platform can certainly have a great loading speed.
Uptime
As far as the DreamPress uptime goes, my DreamPress site recorded an uptime of 100% without any outage and downtime. Hence, DreamPress is an extremely reliable platform in terms of uptime.
Load Testing
To find out the load handling capacity of DreamPress, I performed load testing on my DreamPress site by sending 1000 concurrent traffic to the site in 1 minute and carefully monitoring the way it handled it.
My DreamPress site responded pretty well and recorded 89 ms in Clients Per Test (1000 Clients in 1 Minute), 95 ms in Maintain Client Load (500 Clients in 1 MInute), and 173 ms in Maintain Client Load (1000 Clients in 1 MInute). Going by the results, I wouldn’t say that DreamPress has the best load handling ability, but you can surely count on the platform for high traffic sites.
Global TTFB
It is crucial to check the Global TTFB of DreamPress since many sites rely on multiple global locations for traffic. I pinged my DreamPress site from ten global locations and meticulously observed the way the site responded. My site recorded an average TTFB of 593.588 ms, with a good TTFB in most locations.
The site had TTFB for more than 1 second in two locations. The site recorded the lowest TTFB in San Francisco with 110.84 ms and the highest TTFB in Sydney with 1.08 seconds. However, you can still count on the service for locations other than Sydney and Bangalore.
Core Web Vitals
I tested the Core Web Vitals of my DreamPress site to determine the extent of help sites could get in terms of user experience from this platform. My DreamPress site recorded a ‘Largest Contentful Paint’ of 1.137 s, a ‘Total Blocking time’ of 0.000s, and a ‘Cumulative Layout Shift’ of 0.
I thought the ‘Largest Contentful Paint’ could have been a little lesser. However, it is still a good platform for user experience since the ‘Total Blocking Time’ is 0.000s.
Which Fastest Managed Hosting for WordPress is good for you?
If you are an agency and need a powerful host, then Nexcess should be your choice. If you host fewer sites and need ultimate power, then Templ or Rocket is a good option.
