Hostinger Vs Bluehost
Hostinger Vs Bluehost: The Crucial Differences 2025
OUR CREDENTIALS AND METHODOLOGY AT HOSTINGSTEP
- Lead Reviewer: Mohan Raj, Hostingstep Founder
- Testing Authority: 12+ months continuous monitoring per provider
- Testing Period: January 2024 to March 2025
- Last Updated: May 27, 2025
- Next Update: August 2025
Our Commitment of Transparency:
We purchased hosting plans from both providers independently and tested them with our advanced methodology without their influence. Most importantly, we keep our methodology independent of our affiliate relationships.
Our Independent Test System
At Hostingstep, we follow a 5-Point Testing System:
TTFB & Uptime Monitoring – We monitor TTFB and Upstime using Pingdom synthetic monitoring with 525,600 checks/year from 22 U.S. locations
Load Testing – We use Loader.io stress testing with 0-100 concurrent users over 60 seconds
Global TTFB Testing – We use SpeedVitals monitoring from 40 worldwide locations to test Global TTFB
WPBenchmark Server Testing – We evaluate the Hardware performance including CPU, Memory, Filesystem, and Database.
Standardized WordPress Environment – We conduct our tests on Identical test sites using Twenty Twenty-Four theme, PHP 8.1, and WP Fastest Cache
SUMMARY WITH HEAD TO HEAD WINNER
Quick Summary
| Performance Category | Winner | Performance Gap | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB Performance | Hostinger | 29ms faster | Strong |
| Global TTFB | Bluehost | 109ms advantage | Strong |
| Uptime Reliability | Hostinger | 0.02% better | Elite |
| Load Handling | Bluehost | 125ms faster | Average |
| WPBench Score | Hostinger | 4.0 points higher | Strong |
| WordPress Performance | Hostinger | Better overall server resources | Strong |
In a Nutshell
Overall Winner: Hostinger
Hostinger has a superior server performance with a WPBench score of 8.0 out of 10 while Bluehost scored just 4.0 out of 10. In addition, Hostinger has a better uptime and we also noticed that its TTFB is getting stronger every day, which certainly makes it a great choice for most WordPress users.
Hostinger is Ideal for:
Small and medium websites, blogs and even portfolios that need reliable performance and powerful server resources.
Bluehost is Ideal for:
Websites that focus on Global audiences and have occasional traffic spikes since Bluehost comes with excellent global TTFB and load handling.
VERIFIED PERFORMANCE COMPARISON
TTFB Performance Battle (12-Month Average)
| Provider | TTFB (ms) | Performance Tier | Rating | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hostinger | 443ms | Strong | 8.0/10 | ✓ |
| Bluehost | 472ms | Average | 6.5/10 | 29ms slower |
Winner: Hostinger – Hostinger is the clear winner with faster response times than Bluehost, offering better user experience and SEO rankings.
Global TTFB Regional Breakdown
| Region | Hostinger | Bluehost | Winner | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North America | 474ms | 472ms | Bluehost | 2ms faster |
| Europe | 380ms | 394ms* | Hostinger | 14ms faster |
| Asia-Pacific | 610ms | 394ms* | Bluehost | 216ms faster |
| Australia/Oceania | 680ms | 394ms* | Bluehost | 286ms faster |
| Global Average | 503ms | 394ms | Bluehost | 109ms faster |
Global Performance Winner: Bluehost – Bluehost is the clear winner, delivering an excellent global performance, specifically in Asia Pacific and Oceania regions. It certainly has to do a lot with its Cloudflare integration with Argo routing.
* Specific regional data for Bluehost was not available in the same breakdown.
Uptime Reliability Comparison
Hostinger Uptime
Q1 2025: 100.00% (Elite)
0 mins downtime over 0 outages
Bluehost Uptime
Q1 2025: 99.99% (Elite)
8 mins downtime over 2 outages
| Provider | 12-Month Uptime | Q1 2025 Uptime | Total Downtime | Outage Count | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hostinger | 99.99% | 100.00% | 0h 52m | 5 incidents | ✓ |
| Bluehost | 99.97% | 99.99% | 2h 37m | 13 incidents |
Uptime Winner: Hostinger – As we monitored the uptime of the two hosts, we noticed Hostinger had fewer outages with 5 outages, amounting to a total downtime of 52 minutes, while Bluehost had 13 outages, amounting to 2 hours and 37 minutes. In our Q1 monitoring, Hostinger showed signs of improved uptime reliability with zero outages while Bluehost still had outages.
Practical Impact
For any business site that needs constant availability, Hostinger’s offers approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes less downtime than Bluehost in a year. While Hostinger had 5 outages, Bluehost had 13 outages. It is indeed a big difference when you see it from the perspective of an eCommerce site, where every minute counts and downtime can largely impact the revenue. Hence, such websites will have less disruption with Hostinger than Bluehost.
Load Testing: Traffic Spike Handling
Testing Protocol: 0-100 concurrent users over 60 seconds using Loader.io
Hostinger Load Test Results
Error Rate: Significant errors at high traffic levels
Performance Decline: Sharp degradation beyond 75 users
Compared to Average: Below average load handling
Bluehost Load Test Results
Error Rate: 0% – No errors detected
Performance Decline: Gradual increase in response time
Compared to Average: Slightly better than average
| Provider | Avg Response Time | Error Rate | Peak Handling | Performance Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hostinger | 256ms | Significant | ~75 users | Below Average |
| Bluehost | 131ms | None | 100+ users | Average |
Load Testing Winner: Bluehost – As we tested Bluehost’s load handling capability, we noticed that the performance was way better than that of Hostinger with a response time of 131ms while Hostinger recorded a response time of 256ms. Besides, Bluehost did not throw any errors even while the load was at its peak while Hostinger had a sharp decline as the traffic increased. We also noticed a significant number of errors in the case of Hostinger at high traffic levels.
Our Analysis of Traffic Handling
Bluehost has shown excellent load handling capability in the load testing, which makes it suitable for high traffic websites, or sites with occasional traffic spikes. However, Hostinger’s performance was below average in the load testing, suggesting its incapability in handling high traffic as in growing sites and websites with occasional traffic spikes.
WPBenchmark Hardware Performance
Hostinger WPBench Score
Bluehost WPBench Score
| Component | Hostinger Score | Bluehost Score | Winner | Performance Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Performance | Strong (8.0/10) | Below Average (4.0/10) | Hostinger | 4.0 points |
| Memory Handling | Excellent (9.0/10) | Below Average (3.5/10) | Hostinger | 5.5 points |
| Filesystem I/O | Strong (8.0/10) | Average (5.5/10) | Hostinger | 2.5 points |
| Database Performance | Strong (7.5/10) | Average (5.0/10) | Hostinger | 2.5 points |
| Overall WPBench | 8.0/10 | 4.0/10 | Hostinger | 4.0 points |
Hardware Winner: Hostinger – Hostinger scored 8.0 out of 10 in the WPBench score while Bluehost scored 4.0 out of 10. We noticed high performance across all server components, especially in terms of memory with a 5.5 point advantage, which is crucial for the performance of WordPress sites running multiple plugins.
Impact of Server Performance
Hostinger’s top notch hardware performance has several real-world benefits:
- Faster and smooth WordPress admin dashboard operations
- Content management remains smooth despite resource-intensive plugins and themes
- Faster database operations for dynamic content
- Overall both administrators and visitors should have a smooth experience during normal traffic.
WORDPRESS ERFORMANCE BATTLE
WordPress Core Performance
| WordPress Metric | Hostinger | Bluehost | Winner | Performance Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WordPress Dashboard Load | 1.2s | 2.4s | Hostinger | 50% faster |
| Plugin Installation Time | 3.5s | 6.2s | Hostinger | 44% faster |
| Theme Activation | 2.1s | 4.3s | Hostinger | 51% faster |
| Post Publishing Speed | 1.8s | 3.5s | Hostinger | 49% faster |
| Media Upload Performance | 4.2s | 7.8s | Hostinger | 46% faster |
WordPress Core Performance Winner: Hostinger – Hostinger has a strong WordPress Core Performance, which helps it deliver 44 to 51% quicker WordPress administrative operations in all tested metrics. The high performance makes site administration and content management exceptionally smooth and efficient for websites that get frequent updates as well as for websites with large content libraries.
WordPress Feature Comparison
| WordPress Feature | Hostinger | Bluehost | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| WP Auto-Updates | Available | Available | Tie |
| Staging Environment | Premium plans only | Available on all plans | Bluehost |
| WP-CLI Access | Available | Available | Tie |
| WordPress Multisite | Available | Available | Tie |
| Caching Solution | LiteSpeed Cache (built-in) | WP Fastest Cache | Hostinger |
| CDN Integration | Hostinger CDN (premium plans) | Cloudflare with Argo Routing | Bluehost |
| Free Site Migration | Manual plugin-based | Self-service tool | Bluehost |
WordPress Feature Winner: Tie – As we compared, we found both hosts having good WordPress specific features with different benefits. Hostinger offers a powerful performance backed by LiteSpeed caching. Bluehost, on the other hand, comes with better accessibility, which includes Cloudflare CDN with Argo, staging environment, and a handy migration tool.
WordPress Specific Advantages
Both hosts are recommended hosting providers by WordPress.org. However, Hostinger has a leading edge over Bluehost in terms of core WordPress performance, making it a solid choice for content creators for content management on WordPress. Bluehost has more accessibility based features like built in tools for quicker site creation and migration.
Hostinger WordPress Benefits:
- Makes WordPress admin operations 51% faster
- LiteSpeed Cache offers excellent page caching
- Powerful server resources for better handling of sites with heavy plugins
Bluehost WordPress Benefits:
- All plans come with staging environment
- Faster global delivery with Cloudflare Argo
- Easy migration with the site migration tool
USER SUITABILITY COMPARISON
Performance Suitability Matrix
| User Type | Hostinger Score | Bluehost Score | Better Choice | Key Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personal Blogs |
9.0
|
8.0
|
Hostinger | Better server performance for smoother content creation |
| Small Business |
8.0
|
7.0
|
Hostinger | Better overall performance for professional site presentation |
| eCommerce |
6.0
|
6.0
|
Tie | Both have limitations for larger stores; premium WooCommerce plans recommended |
| High-Traffic Sites |
4.0
|
6.0
|
Bluehost | Better load handling during traffic spikes |
| Developer Projects |
7.0
|
5.5
|
Hostinger | Better server resources for development environments |
| Global Audience |
6.0
|
8.0
|
Bluehost | Superior global TTFB with Cloudflare Argo routing |
Which Provider to Choose
Hostinger is the ideal choice if:
- You need a faster performance everyday – Hostinger scored 8.0 out of 10 in the WPBench, which suggests its high quality server resources for a smoother WordPress dashboard experience and faster page loads during normal traffic.
- You manage content on WordPress almost daily – Hostinger’s up to 51% faster admin operations make a significant difference for regular content updates
- You need to run WordPress sites with heavy plugins – Hostinger has an excellent memory handling capability with a score of 9.0 out of 10, which is why even websites with heavy plugins can expect high performance with Hostinger.
- You need the best value for money – Hostinger comes with affordable pricing yet offers excellent performance and a good value for money.
- You need better and advanced caching – Hostinger offers server-level LiteSpeed caching, which helps in exceptional speed optimization much better than what is delivered by traditional caching plugins.
Bluehost is the ideal choice if:
- Your site has traffic spikes – Bluehost has better load handling capability with a response time of 131ms, which can help websites perform equally well even during traffic spikes.
- You need to target global audiences – Bluehost has an excellent global TTFB of 109ms backed by Cloudflare Argo routing, which helps websites target global audiences especially in Asia and Australia.
- You are looking for WordPress staging on low tier plans – Bluehost has the staging feature on all plans including entry level plans, while Hostinger offers staging on only Premium plans.
- You need phone support – Unlike Hostinger, Bluehost offers 24/7 phone support.
- You have sites to migrate – Bluehost comes with a self service migration tool to help you with a quick and easy site migration while Hostinger has a manual plugin based approach to site migration.
Host Recommendation Based on Performance
Small and Medium WordPress Sites: Hostinger can be ideal for small and medium websites with faster loading times and smoother WordPress operations backed by its top notch server resources and reliable uptime. It’s also worth mentioning that the host has the most affordable pricing and offers a good value for money.
For High Traffic Sites: If you have a website with unexpected traffic spikes or your website targets global audiences especially in Asia and Australia, Bluehost is the ideal host to go with since it comes with exceptional load handling capability and excellent TTFB in Asia and Australia.
FEATURES COMPARISON
Control Panel & Management
| Feature | Hostinger | Bluehost | Winner | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Panel Type | hPanel (Custom) | Custom + cPanel | Hostinger | More intuitive interface with better organization |
| WordPress Management | One-click installer, auto-updates | Built-in WordPress tools, auto-updates | Bluehost | Better WordPress integration and management interface |
| File Manager Quality | Good (8/10) | Good (7.5/10) | Hostinger | Slightly more responsive file management |
| Database Management | phpMyAdmin with easy access | phpMyAdmin through cPanel | Tie | Both provide standard database tools |
| Website Builder | AI-based drag-and-drop builder | Basic drag-and-drop builder | Hostinger | More advanced AI-powered site building tools |
Control Panel Winner: Hostinger – The host has one of the most user friendly control panels called the hPanel with a clean interface and AI powered site builder for easy site management. Beginners should certainly find hPanel easier than the traditional cPanel.
Security & Backup Features
| Security Feature | Hostinger | Bluehost | Winner | Security Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free SSL Certificates | Yes (Let’s Encrypt) | Yes (Let’s Encrypt) | Tie | Both provide essential HTTPS encryption |
| Malware Scanning | Basic scanning | SiteLock security (paid add-on) | Bluehost | More comprehensive security options available |
| DDoS Protection | Server-level protection | Cloudflare integration | Bluehost | Better DDoS mitigation with Cloudflare |
| Backup Frequency | Weekly backups | Daily (1st year free, then paid) | Tie* | Bluehost has better frequency but hidden costs |
| Domain Privacy | Free for life | Included with Choice Plus+ plans | Hostinger | Better privacy protection on all plans |
Both Hostinger and Bluehost do a commendable job when it comes to security and backup. Bluehost offers DDoS protection through Cloudflare and besides, has a provision for advanced security options through paid addons. Hostinger offers DDoS protection through Cloudflare as well and additionally, offers weekly backup and domain privacy on all plans for free. Even Bluehost offers free daily backups on all plans. However, Bluehost offers free daily backups only for the first year and after that, it becomes paid.
Developer & Advanced Features
| Developer Feature | Hostinger | Bluehost | Winner | Developer Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSH Access | Available | Available | Tie | Essential command line access |
| Git Integration | Limited | Limited | Tie | Basic version control capabilities |
| PHP Version Control | PHP 7.4 – 8.2 | PHP 7.4 – 8.1 | Hostinger | Access to newer PHP versions |
| Database Access | phpMyAdmin, MySQL | phpMyAdmin, MySQL | Tie | Standard database management |
| Server Configuration | LiteSpeed Server | Apache/Nginx | Hostinger | Better performance optimization capabilities |
| Staging Environment | Premium plans only | All plans | Bluehost | Better development workflow on entry plans |
Developer Features Winner: Hostinger – Both hosts come with good developer tools but Hostinger has a leading edge over Bluehost since it offers LiteSpeed server technology and newer PHP versions while Bluehost offers staging environments on all plans for developers to test changes before deploying them to the production site.
REAL COST ANALYSIS
Plan Comparison (Entry-Level)
| Feature | Hostinger Premium | Bluehost Basic | Better Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $2.99/month | $2.95/month | Bluehost |
| Renewal Price | $8.99/month | $11.99/month | Hostinger |
| Performance/Dollar | High (8.0 WPBench) | Low (4.0 WPBench) | Hostinger |
| Storage Included | 50GB SSD | 10GB SSD | Hostinger |
| Bandwidth | 100GB | Unmetered | Bluehost |
| Websites Allowed | 25 | 10 | Hostinger |
| Free Domain | Yes (1 year) | Yes (1 year) | Tie |
| Free Email | Limited | None ($2.99+/mo) | Hostinger |
| Free Backups | Weekly | 1st year only | Hostinger |
True Cost Analysis
Hostinger Annual Cost:
Year 1 (Premium Plan):
- Base hosting: $35.88 ($2.99 × 12)
- Domain registration: $0 (free first year)
- Domain privacy: $0 (free for life)
- Email hosting: $0 (limited free)
- Total first year: $35.88
Year 2 (Renewal):
- Base hosting: $107.88 ($8.99 × 12)
- Domain renewal: $10.99
- Domain privacy: $0 (free for life)
- Email hosting: $0 (limited free)
- Total renewal year: $118.87
Bluehost Annual Cost:
Year 1 (Basic Plan):
- Base hosting: $35.40 ($2.95 × 12)
- Domain registration: $0 (free first year)
- Backups: $0 (free first year)
- Email hosting: $35.88 ($2.99 × 12)
- Total first year: $71.28
Year 2 (Renewal):
- Base hosting: $143.88 ($11.99 × 12)
- Domain renewal: $17.99
- Backups: $47.88 ($3.99 × 12)
- Email hosting: $35.88 ($2.99 × 12)
- Total renewal year: $245.63
| Cost Period | Hostinger Premium | Bluehost Basic | Hostinger Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Year Total | $35.88 | $71.28 | $35.40 (50%) |
| Second Year Total | $118.87 | $245.63 | $126.76 (52%) |
| 3-Year Total | $273.62 | $562.54 | $288.92 (51%) |
| Monthly Equivalent (3 years) | $7.60 | $15.63 | $8.03 (51%) |
Value Winner: Hostinger – Unlike Bluehost that comes with hidden costs for essential features like backups and email hosting, Hostinger keeps its pricing affordable and transparent for customers yet delivers a powerful server performance. When compared with Bluehost, Hostinger offers approximately 50% lower total cost for a period of 3 years, helping you save nearly $290.
CUSTOMER SUPPORT COMPARISON
Support Response Testing
| Support Channel | Hostinger | Bluehost | Winner | Response Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Live Chat Response | 2-5 minutes | 2-5 minutes | Tie | Both provide quick initial responses |
| Ticket Response | 15-45 minutes | 4-8 hours | Hostinger | Significantly faster ticket resolution |
| Phone Support | Not Available | 5-15 minutes | Bluehost | Additional support channel option |
| Technical Knowledge | 8.5/10 | 7.5/10 | Hostinger | Better technical expertise level |
| Problem Resolution | 7.5/10 | 7.0/10 | Hostinger | Slightly better issue resolution |
Real Support Test Results
WordPress Performance Issue and Resolution:
Hostinger Response:
- Response time: 3 minutes
- Quality of Solution: LiteSpeed caching specific configuration tips provided
- Follow up: Agent waited and proactively checked the changes
- Resolution: Issue resolved with the agent’s optimization suggestions
Bluehost Response:
- Response time: 4 minutes
- Quality of Solution: WP Fastest Cache plugin with basic settings suggested
- Follow up: No one followed up
- Resolution: Issue resolved but partially
Server Configuration Problem Test:
Hostinger Response:
- Response time: 6 minutes
- Solution quality: Provided detailed PHP configuration guidance
- Follow-up: Sent follow-up email with additional resources
- Resolution: Complete resolution with additional optimization tips
Bluehost Response:
- Response time: 8 minutes (Live Chat), 11 minutes (Phone)
- Solution quality: Basic guidance, required escalation for technical issues
- Follow-up: Required a follow-up ticket
- Resolution: Complete resolution after ticket escalation
Emergency Downtime Response Test:
Hostinger Response:
- Response time: 2 minutes
- Solution quality: Immediate investigation of server status
- Follow-up: Real-time updates during resolution
- Resolution: Issue identified and resolved within 15 minutes
Bluehost Response:
- Response time: 3 minutes (Live Chat), 5 minutes (Phone)
- Solution quality: Quickly escalated to technical team
- Follow-up: Email updates on resolution progress
- Resolution: Issue resolved within 20 minutes
Self-Help Resources:
Hostinger Knowledge Base:
- Comprehensiveness: Extensive (400+ articles)
- Quality & Clarity: Excellent step-by-step tutorials
- Video Content: Limited but growing library
- Overall Rating: 8.5/10
Bluehost Knowledge Base:
- Comprehensiveness: Very extensive (500+ articles)
- Quality & Clarity: Good with clear illustrations
- Video Content: Well-developed video tutorials
- Overall Rating: 9.0/10
Support Winner: Tie but with different strengths – Hostinger offers faster ticket resolution even for complex server issues backed by excellent expertise. However, Bluehost has phone support unlike Hostinger. Besides, Bluehost has a comprehensive knowledge base for users to quickly find solutions to their websites’ technical issues.
THE FINAL VERDICT
Overall Performance Scoring
| Category | Weight | Hostinger | Bluehost | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB Performance | 20% | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 | Hostinger |
| Global TTFB | 15% | 6.5/10 | 8.0/10 | Bluehost |
| Uptime Reliability | 20% | 9.5/10 | 8.5/10 | Hostinger |
| Load Testing | 15% | 4.5/10 | 7.0/10 | Bluehost |
| WPBench Score | 10% | 8.0/10 | 4.0/10 | Hostinger |
| WordPress Features | 10% | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 | Tie |
| Support Quality | 10% | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | Tie |
| TOTAL SCORE | 100% | 7.6/10 | 7.0/10 | Hostinger |
Overall Winner: Hostinger
Why Hostinger wins:
As we compared the two hosts, Hostinger turned out to be the clear winner with an overall score of 7.6 out of 10, while Bluehost scored 7.0 out of 10. We noticed a huge difference between the two hosts in terms of server hardware capabilities, reflected by the WPBench scores. Hostinger scored 8.0 out of 10 in the WPBench score, while Bluehost could score only 4.0 out of 10. The difference was clearly visible as our Hostinger site had approximately 50% faster WordPress administrative operations and an exceptional handling of heavy plugins and themes.
It’s also worth mentioning that Hostinger has an excellent uptime of 99.99%, slightly better than that of Bluehost, which is 99.97%. However, what makes Hostinger’s uptime more reliable than Bluehost is the number of outages it had during the past 12 months. In our 12 months of uptime monitoring, Hostinger had 5 outages while Bluehost had 13 outages. Besides, we noticed some improvements in the Hostinger’s uptime in recent times as well. Furthermore, Hostinger has a daily TTFB of 443ms while Bluehost has a daily TTFB of 472ms and Hostinger’s daily TTFB is slightly better than that of Bluehost during normal traffic conditions backed by LiteSpeed server technology.
If we consider price and value, Hostinger certainly offers better value than Bluehost at approximately half the total cost of Bluehost over a period of 3 years. Hostinger plans are way more affordable than Bluehost and it’s because Bluehost has hidden costs for essential services like backups and email hosting.
Performance Margin: Clear
Hostinger’s performance advantage is clear and substantial in most key metrics, with the exception of load handling and global TTFB. The 0.6-point overall score difference represents a meaningful performance gap that would be noticeable to most WordPress users, particularly those who work frequently in the WordPress dashboard.
Alternative Scenario:
Bluehost still remains suitable for websites that target global audiences in Asia Pacific and Oceania regions since it has excellent global TTFB backed by its Cloudflare integration with Agro routing . Besides, the host is ideal for websites that experience traffic spikes because of its strong load handling capability.
OUR QUICK DECISION GUIDE
Opt for Hostinger If:
- You are under a tight budget – Powerful server performance at almost half the three year cost
- You are into WordPress content management – Experience 50% faster WordPress admin operations
- Your sites use heavy plugins – Capitalize on powerful memory handling and database performance
- You need to host multiple websites – Host up to 25 sites on the entry-level plan
- You need constant availability – Have better uptime reliability for your sites with fewer outages
Opt for Bluehost If:
- Your websites target global audiences – Have better content delivery worldwide especially in Asia Pacific
- Your site has traffic spikes – Ensure consistently good performance even during high-traffic periods
- You need phone support – Access round the clock phone support alongside live chat
- You need staging feature on all plans – Get staging environments on entry-level plans
- You need to migrate existing site – Migrate site flawlessly with Bluehost’s streamlined site migration tool
Conclusion:
Hostinger offers excellent WordPress performance for small and medium websites in normal traffic conditions at half of the long term cost while Bluehost is ideal for websites targeting global audiences as well as websites with unexpected traffic spikes.
TRANSPARENCY OF METHODOLOGY
Hostingstep Testing Standards
- Duration: Continuous monitoring of every provider over a period of 12 months
- Test Sites: Sites with identical WordPress installations with Twenty Twenty-Four theme
- PHP Version: 8.1 (standardized across all tests)
- Caching: WP Fastest Cache with consistent configuration
- Monitoring Tools: Pingdom, Loader.io, SpeedVitals, WPBenchmark
- Test Frequency: 525,600 TTFB checks per year and monthly load tests
Update Commitment
We will update this comparison every quarter with the latest performance data and the next update is scheduled for August 2025.
This comparison is a part of our data driven and transparent hosting reviews. All testing was done using our standardized methodology in an independent manner.
