FastComet Review 2025: Rated (6.8/10)
FastComet Hosting: Quick Overview
FastComet offers a mixed WordPress hosting experience with strong performance on TTFB and load handling but fails hard at providing sufficient uptime. It has got only 99.84% uptime which is less than their guaranteed uptime SLA of 99.9%.
Performance Metrics
Pros
- Strong load handling performance (79ms)
- 12 global data centers across the globe.
- 45-day money-back guarantee (longer than industry standard)
- Deep discounted starting price at $1.79/month
Cons
- Poor uptime (99.84%), lowest among all tested hosts
- Limited storage on starter plan (10GB NVMe)
- Average WPBench score (4.8/10)
- Renewal prices are higher than intro rates
Executive Summary: Is FastComet Right for You?
| User Type | Suitability Score | Key Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Personal Blogs |
7.5
|
Good for basic blogs where occasional downtimes are acceptable |
| Small Business |
6.5
|
Uptime is a concern on starter and Essential plan, so we recommend either Plus or Extra plan. |
| eCommerce |
5.0
|
Not recommended for WooCommerce; consider Rocket.net or Cloudways instead |
| Enterprise |
3.5
|
It doesnt offer the required reliability and performance for Enteprise needs |
| Developers |
6.0
|
Includes all cPanel specific dev tools. |
Key Differentiator
FastComet’s primary differentiator is its very affordable price to get stared along with the option to host across 12 data center locations globally. It doesn’t matter where you live and your target audiences are, FastComet has got you covered. It also offers 45-days money back guarnatee where most shared host offer only up to 30 days guarnatee.
In a Sentence
FastComet delivers decent performance on Starter and Essential plans with concerning uptime scores. Considering their strong TTFB and load handling scores, I recommend to choose Pro or Extra plan.
Our Testing Approach
At Hostingstep, We conduct long term testing to measure the real performance of web hosting companies. All hosts, including FastComet, go through five different testing protocols.
TTFB & Uptime Monitoring
- Tool: Pingdom synthetic monitoring
- Frequency: Every 60 seconds (525,600 checks/year)
- Locations: 22 North American regions
- Metrics: Response time (TTFB), uptime percentage
This continuous monitoring provides real-world performance over time, not just random testing time periods.
Load Testing
- Tool: Loader.io
- Protocol: 0-100 concurrent users over 60 seconds
- Metrics: Average response time, error rate
- Frequency: Monthly stress tests
These tests showcase how FastComet handles traffic spikes and whether it actually handles the load without any issues.
WPBenchmark Testing
- Tool: WPBenchmark plugin
- Metrics: CPU, memory, file system, database
- Scoring: Standardized 10-point scale
- Frequency: Quarterly benchmarks
These benchmarks evaluate the hardware performance of FastComet hosting.
Global TTFB Testing
- Tool: SpeedVitals
- Coverage: 40 worldwide locations
- Regions: North America, Europe, Asia, Australia
- Metrics: Region-specific response times
Got sites with international traffic? We test our FastComet test site from 40 global locations to see if they are fast enough for your visitors.
Standardized Test Environment
- Platform: WordPress with identical installs
- Theme: Twenty Twenty-Four
- Plugins: WP Fastest Cache, Rank Math, Contact Form 7
- PHP Version: 8.1 across all tests
All our test sites including FastComet are tested using the same test bench for fair comparisons.
Long-term Data Collection
- Duration: Minimum 12 months of testing
- Data Points: Over 500,000 tests per host
- Baseline: All hosts purchased independently
- Updates: Quarterly reviews of all metrics
We include standard 12-month data collected over a year (Jan – Dec) of the previous year and latest Q1 (Jan – Mar) data for better performance identification.
The Hostingstep Difference
Unlike many review sites that rely on short-term unverifiable tests or affiliate relationships, our methodology-backed test bench setup ensures standardized performance data collection across all hosts including FastComet using our test sites. We independently purchase hosting accounts (access our invoices), deploy standardized test sites, and conduct performance monitoring 24/7, 365 days a year. This approach brings you the most accurate real-world performance data that users expect to know about the company.
Learn more about our testing methodologies:
FastComet Verified Performance Data
TTFB Response Time
Q1 2025: 501ms (Average)
43,800 data points from 22 locations
Uptime Performance
Q1 2025: 99.95% (Strong)
108 mins downtime over 8 outages
Load Test Results
Testing Protocol: 0-100 concurrent users over 60 seconds
Error Rate: 0% (excellent handling)
Compared to Average: 46% faster than typical hosts in this price range
WPBench Score
Global TTFB
Performance Rating Scale
More Benchmark Data
Looking for more performance data? Check out our comprehensive benchmark reports:
FastComet vs. Top Competitors
Based on Google search data, we’ve picked the following hosts which are constantly getting compared with FastComet. All performance metrics shown below were collected during the same 12-month period using identical WordPress test environments on similarly priced entry-level plans to ensure a fair comparison.
Performance Comparison
| Host | TTFB | Uptime | Load Test | Global TTFB | WPBench | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FastComet |
427ms
|
99.84%
|
79ms
|
553ms
|
4.8/10
|
6.8 |
| SiteGround |
510ms
|
99.99%
|
147ms
|
886ms
|
8.3/10
|
7.7 |
| Bluehost |
472ms
|
99.97%
|
131ms
|
394ms
|
4.0/10
|
7.0 |
| Hostinger |
443ms
|
99.99%
|
256ms
|
503ms
|
8.0/10
|
7.6 |
| Rocket.net |
335ms
|
99.99%
|
N/A
|
177ms
|
8.1/10
|
9.2 |
Competitor Analysis Summary
FastComet offers a mixed performance scores when compared to its competitors. As dicussed earlier, FastComet offers strong TTFB and beats every other host like SiteGround, Bluehost and Hostinger. But the uptime score is a big letdown and it gives a clear picture, the speed doesn’t matter when host is unreliable. Again, on the load test score, FastComet excels outperforming all the hosts, which makes me to recommend FastComet only with Pro or Extra plans as it comes with better server resources, so there is a possibility of good uptime.
Based on above data, if you’re considering alternatives to FastComet, here are the options:
Rocket.net
It offers elite performance across all performance metrics with industry-leading global TTFB (177ms) and 99.99% uptime. Perfect for enterprise and business websites.
Visit Rocket.netHostinger
It comes with similar pricing of FastComet, yet offers excellent uptime (99.99%),similar TTFB score, strong WPBench score (8.0/10) make it a great alternative with better reliability than FastComet.
Visit HostingerCloudways
Provides strong TTFB (405ms), excellent 99.99% uptime, and the best non-CDN global TTFB performance (444ms) for global audience targeted websites.
Visit CloudwaysNote: All hosting providers were tested with identical WordPress installations and configurations to ensure fair comparisons.
Data sources: Performance metrics based on Hostingstep’s continuous monitoring over 12 months. Pricing information accurate as of May 2025.
FastComet: Detailed Pros and Cons
What We Liked
Excellent Load Handling Capabilities
In our load testing benchmark, FastComet showcases excellent performance at 79ms despite the limited server resources on Essential plan which we have tested. Though, it’s not the fastest score among shared hosts, it still good to get such load handling scores as they outperform many premium providers like SiteGround (147ms) and Bluehost (131ms).
Competitive North American TTFB
We tested FastComet with our test hosted in their US data center. The data shows FastComet offers strong TTFB response time of 427ms for visitors in North American region, even without the need for CDN. For comparison, SiteGround which costs 10x more averaged 510ms in the same time period.
Global Data Center Coverage
FastComet offers you the options to host from 12 data centers across North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and South America. This locations helps you to host your sites closer to your targeted audiences. The data center are located in Newark, Dallas, Chicago, Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Stockholm, Singapore, Tokyo, Sydney, and Mumbai.
Extended Money-Back Guarantee
FastComet provides a 45-day money-back guarantee, which exceeds the regular 30 days period offered by most companies.
Budget-Friendly Pricing
Starting at just $1.79/month for the Starter plan, FastComet offers one of the most affordable pricing to host your WordPress sites. Though their uptime is fell short, if you are looking to host a hobby kind of site, FastComet offers the best value.
Limitations to Consider
Below average Uptime Performance
The biggest drawback of FastComet is their uptime. We have been getting consistently poor uptime (99.84%) in the last few years and that too on their Essential plan (which is not their starter plan). This makes me to believe both the starter and Essential plans are not worth for business sites. Our uptime also falls short of their guaranteed SLA of 99.9%. If you are getting thier Plus or Extra plan, make sure to monitor the uptime.
Average Server Hardware
FastComet WPBench score is below average at 4.8/10. It means the server resources are highly limited and the sites will slow during intensive tasks. To compare, Hostinger at similar pricing, scored a 8.0/10 in WPBench score indicating they are good for faster backend functions.
Limited Storage
This is not a major concern, most companies limit the storage space to something around 10GB on stater plans.
Inconsistent Global Performance
FastComet doesn’t offer any integrated CDN solution. As a result, their global TTFB is higher at Asia-pacific regions. So, if you are running a site with global audience, choose a host with integrated CDN.
Significant Renewal Price Increases
FastComet renewal prices are higher, much similar to other shared hosting services. But when compared with performance, it doesn’t offer the best value. The Hostinger renews at much lesser than FastComet, yet the offer strong TTFB, Uptime, and WPBench scores.
FastComet: Final Verdict
FastComet offers a mixed performance in the WordPress hosting space. They are surely affordable to get started at $1.79/month but their uptime is terrible and not suitable for any real business websites. I say this based on the Starter and Essential plans. At the same price point, there are multiple providers like GreenGeeks, Hostinger and Hosting.com offers the best value for money with balanced performance across all metrics including uptime.
FastComet’s uptime is 99.84% over 12 months, the lowest among all hosts we have tested in our benchmarks. This translates to around 14 hours of downtime annually. Host like Hostinger at similar price had just 52 minutes of downtime and recorded 99.99% uptime. This reliability issue, make us not to recommend FastComet for any kind of serious business websites.
Key Takeaways
FastComet offers affordable pricing at $1.79/month with good TTFB and load handling, but it’s uptime score of 99.84% is lowest among all tested hosts.
You can host from their 12 global data centers, powered by a 45-day money-back guarantee, FastComet offers reduced risk for new customers.
Limited storage (10GB on the starter plan) and high renewal rates (up to 400% increase) can be a concern during renewals.
Mostly suitable for hobby blogs and sites where uptime doesn’t matter; business websites should consider reliable alternatives.
Who Should Choose FastComet
- Budget-conscious bloggers looking for affordable hosting with decent performance for hobby websites.
- Beginners who need a longer money-back guarantee time period to test the service.
- Sites with high traffic spikes can choose Plus or Extra plan for reliable load handling.
Who Should Look Elsewhere
- Business website owners who need reliable hosting with minimal downtimes.
- WooCommerce sites who need a higher WPBench score for resource intensive tasks.
- Media-heavy websites that require more than the limited 10-20GB storage on FastComet’s entry and mid-tier plans.
Methodology Transparency
At Hostingstep, we believe transparency in our review methodology is essential for maintaining reader trust. Here’s exactly how we tested FastComet and the complete details you need to know.
Testing Period
- Initial Purchase: January 2024
- Test Duration: 12 months
- Last Data Collection: March 31, 2025
- Review Updated: May 13, 2025
We commit to quarterly updates on FastComet reviews based on latest performance monitoring data, ensuring our review remains the most accurate on the internet.
Test Environment
- Plan Tested: FastComet Essential Plan
- WordPress Version: 6.4.3 (updated throughout testing)
- Theme: Twenty Twenty-Four
- PHP Version: 8.1
- Caching: WP Fastest Cache (standard configuration)
- Content: Standardized posts, pages, and media files
We use identical test environments across all hosting providers to ensure fair and meaningful comparisons.
Testing Tools & Methodology
- Uptime Monitoring: Pingdom (60-second interval checks)
- TTFB Testing: Pingdom (North America) & SpeedVitals (Global)
- Load Testing: Loader.io (0-100 concurrent users over 60 seconds)
- Server Benchmarking: WPBenchmark plugin (v4.2)
- Feature Testing: Manual verification by our technical team
All performance metrics are verified through multiple testing sessions to ensure accuracy and account for normal variations in hosting performance.
Ethics Statement
This review was conducted independently without input from FastComet. We purchased our hosting account as a regular customer at regular pricing to ensure we received the same website plan as any customer.
While we use affiliate links that may generate commissions, our ratings and recommendations are never influenced by potential earnings which can be verified by yourself. Our testing methodology remain consistent across all providers, regardless of affiliate relationships.
Hostingstep is committed to editorial independence and transparency. All our top recommended hosts are purely based on data and not affected by any external factors.
Our Commitment to You
We commit to update this FastComet review regularly with fresh data and insights as FastComet evolves. Our last data collection was completed on March 31, 2025, and next update will be at the end of Q2 2025. If you have questions about our methodology or custom requirements not covered in this review, please contact our editorial team at info@hostingstep.com.
Mohan Raj, founder of Hostingstep.com is passionate about WordPress and specializes in server management and speed optimization. With experience across top hosting providers, he launched Hostingstep.com to deliver honest, data-backed hosting reviews, helping website owners focus on growing their business instead of troubleshooting websites.