WordPress Hosting Benchmarks 2026: 24/7, 365 Days Tested

We are back with our WordPress Hosting Benchmarks for 2026. The report is built on 365 days of continuous monitoring data collected from January 1 to December 31, 2025: 17 hosts with a full year of data, plus 13 providers added on October 1, 2025 with Q4 2025 data.

We purchase our own hosting accounts, set up identical WordPress sites, and monitor them 24/7 at 60-second intervals from 19 North American locations. That produces 525,600 TTFB and uptime checks per host per year, data that is not available anywhere else on the internet. For 2026 performance updates, see our Best WordPress hosting roundup, which we refresh every quarter.

Key findings, 2025 full year
  • WP Engine is the fastest host at 365ms average TTFB, taking #1 from Rocket.net (373ms) for the first time since our monitoring began in 2020. It is also the most consistent, with a 244ms gap between its best and worst day.
  • Nobody hit 100% uptime. Templ came closest at 99.9996% (2 minutes down, 1 outage). ChemiCloud was the only full-year host below the 99.9% line, at 99.7559% with 67 outages.
  • GreenGeeks is the best shared host and one of three A+ overall grades alongside WP Engine and Templ. Its 26ms load-test response is the fastest shared result we have recorded in five years.
  • Bluehost and HostGator jumped to 9.6/10 on WPBench (from 4.0 and 4.3) after their Oracle Cloud migration, the highest resource allocation in the pool.
  • Edge-caching CDN hosts average 154ms global TTFB, 3x faster than static-CDN (532ms) or no-CDN hosts (478ms). A static-asset CDN is no faster globally than having no CDN at all.
  • Managed WordPress is only 66ms faster than shared on TTFB, but shared hosts suffered 6x more outages (35 vs 5.9 a year). The premium buys reliability, not speed.
  • Among the new entrants, Pressable and WordPress.com posted 100% Q4 uptime, 12ms and 16ms load-test results, and sub-75ms global TTFB, the strongest debut in our history.

Provider Report Card

Letter grades across all five benchmark tests, assigned by percentile rank within the pool: A+ (top 15%), A (top 30%), B+ (top 45%), B (top 60%), C (top 75%), D (top 88%), F (bottom). Overall is the average of the five grades, re-ranked on the same scale. Rocket.net has no overall grade because its load test could not run (security block).

Full-Year Report Card (17 hosts, 365 days of data)

Hosting
TTFB
Uptime
Load
WPBench
Global
Overall
WP Engine
A+
A
A+
B
A+
A+
Templ
A+
A+
B+
B+
A+
A+
GreenGeeks
A
B
A+
B
B+
A+
Kinsta
B+
B
A+
A+
C
A
Liquid Web
B
B+
B+
A
B+
A
Hostinger
B
A
C
A
B+
B+
Bluehost
D
B+
A
A+
A
B+
WPX Hosting
A
A+
B+
B
C
B+
Cloudways
A
A+
D
C
B+
B
Hosting.com
B+
C
A
B
C
B
FastComet
C
D
B
C
C
C
SiteGround
F
B
B
A+
F
C
DreamPress
F
C
C
B+
D
C
ChemiCloud
C
F
F
B+
C
D
NameHero
B
D
D
D
C
D
HostGator
D
F
C
A+
F
F
Rocket.net
A+
A
n/a
A
A+
n/a
A+ Top 15%
A Top 30%
B+ Top 45%
B Top 60%
C Top 75%
D Top 88%
F Bottom

WP Engine, Templ and GreenGeeks earn an overall A+. None of the 17 hosts earned straight A grades, so every provider has at least one weakness. WP Engine comes closest: A+ in TTFB, load test and global TTFB, A in uptime, and only a B in WPBench holds it back.

SiteGround is the most polarized host, with A+ in WPBench but F in both TTFB and global TTFB: high resource allocation, slow response times. Bluehost shows a similar split, D in TTFB against A+ in WPBench and A in global TTFB, where the CDN masks a slow origin. GreenGeeks is the best-balanced shared host, with A in TTFB, A+ in load test and no grade below B.

How We Tested

Test site: WordPress 6.9.4, Twenty Twenty-Four theme, PHP 8.4, with Akismet, Contact Form 7 and Rank Math active. Server-side caching on managed WordPress hosts; WP Fastest Cache on most shared hosts; a host’s own caching plugin where one is bundled (SG Optimizer, Breeze).

TTFB and uptime: Pingdom checks every 60 seconds from 19 North American locations (Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Matawan, New York, Phoenix, Portland, Salt Lake City, San Francisco, Seattle, St. Louis, Tampa, Washington, Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver) over HTTPS, with a 30-second timeout for downtime. 365 days for the main cohort (525,600 checks per host), 92 days for the Q4 2025 entrants (132,480 checks).

Load test, WPBench and global TTFB are single point-in-time runs, so read them as a snapshot rather than a year-long result. Loader.io sends 100 concurrent clients from AWS US-East for 60 seconds; WPBenchmark scores allocated CPU, memory, filesystem and database throughput from 0 to 10; SpeedVitals measures cached TTFB from 40 worldwide locations.

We tested the cheapest plan each host sells, bought with our own money, with each host’s own CDN and nothing else. If a plan includes a CDN, it was turned on; if not, we added nothing. Higher plans from the same company usually get more CPU and memory and will often be faster; nothing here describes them.

How to read the labels. Google treats TTFB at or under 800ms as good and only calls it poor above 1,800ms. Every full-year host is inside that band, so our labels (“Fastest tested”, “Mid-pack”, “Slower than most”) rank hosts against each other, not against a pass mark. Google’s 800ms line and the 99.9% uptime SLA line are drawn on every chart where they apply. Our figures come from monitoring probes on an identical install, not from Google’s field data on real visitors; the two are related but not the same number.

Benchmark Test 1: TTFB (Time to First Byte)

TTFB is the time the server takes to start responding to a request, averaged across 19 North American locations at 60-second intervals: 43,800 tests per month and 525,600 per year, per provider.

Average TTFB, Full Year 2025
365 days of continuous monitoring · 525,600 tests per provider · lower is better
pool median 476ms
Google “good” ceiling 800ms
WP Engine
365ms
Rocket.net
373ms
Templ
386ms
WPX Hosting
411ms
GreenGeeks
422ms
Cloudways
449ms
Kinsta
459ms
Hosting.com
470ms
NameHero
476ms
Hostinger
483ms
Liquid Web
497ms
FastComet
521ms
ChemiCloud
528ms
Bluehost
532ms
HostGator
580ms
SiteGround
632ms
DreamPress
663ms
Fastest tested (under 400ms)
Faster than most (400–500ms)
Mid-pack (500–550ms)
Slower than most (550–650ms)
Slowest tested (over 650ms)
All 17 hosts are inside Google’s 800ms good band. Labels rank hosts against each other; the dashed line is the pool median.
#HostingAverage TTFBvs pool median (476ms)
1
WP Engine
365ms−23%
2
Rocket.net
373ms−22%
3
Templ
386ms−19%
4
WPX Hosting
411ms−14%
5
GreenGeeks
422ms−11%
6
Cloudways
449ms−6%
7
Kinsta
459ms−4%
8
Hosting.com
470ms−1%
9
NameHero
476ms0%
10
Hostinger
483ms+1%
11
Liquid Web
497ms+4%
12
FastComet
521ms+9%
13
ChemiCloud
528ms+11%
14
Bluehost
532ms+12%
15
HostGator
580ms+22%
16
SiteGround
632ms+33%
17
DreamPress
663ms+39%
Show full table

WP Engine takes #1 in TTFB for the first time since our monitoring began in 2020, at 365ms. Rocket.net drops to #2 at 373ms after four consecutive years on top (2021–2024). Templ holds #3 at 386ms. All three sit under 400ms, and the gap between them is 21ms, so the top of the pool is closer than it has been in any previous year.

The gap between the fastest and slowest host is 298ms, so hosting choice alone accounts for nearly a 2x difference in server response time.

GreenGeeks (422ms) is the fastest shared host and beats five managed WordPress providers costing 5–10x more, including Kinsta and Liquid Web. Liquid Web crosses under 500ms for the first time in our testing at 497ms. Bluehost’s 532ms is a blend of old infrastructure and its Q4 2025 Oracle Cloud migration; the Q1 2026 figures in our Bluehost review show where it has settled.

At the bottom, DreamPress (663ms) is the slowest full-year host even after we enabled the CDN it added in 2025, and it has regressed from 437ms in 2024. SiteGround (632ms) has slipped every year since 2022 (403ms → 632ms). HostGator (580ms) is the only host in the bottom three that improved, down 26.5% from 789ms after its Oracle Cloud migration.

TTFB screenshots: full year 2025 (17 hosts)
WP Engine - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025WP Engine
Rocket.net - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025Rocket.net
Templ - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025Templ
WPX - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025WPX
GreenGeeks - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025GreenGeeks
Cloudways - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025Cloudways
Kinsta - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025Kinsta
Hosting.com - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025Hosting.com
NameHero - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025NameHero
Hostinger - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025Hostinger
Liquid Web - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025Liquid Web
FastComet - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025FastComet
ChemiCloud - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025ChemiCloud
Bluehost - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025Bluehost
HostGator - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025HostGator
SiteGround - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025SiteGround
DreamPress - TTFB screenshot, full year 2025DreamPress

Benchmark Test 2: Uptime

Uptime is measured by the same Pingdom checks from 19 North American locations with a 30-second timeout. If the site does not respond within the threshold, downtime is recorded. The bar shows total downtime in minutes; the percentage, minutes and outage count print beside it because two hosts at 99.99% can have very different years.

Uptime, Full Year 2025
365 days · 19 North American locations · 30-second timeout · bar = total downtime in minutes · shorter is better
99.9% SLA = 526 min
Templ
99.9996%2 min · 1 outage
Cloudways
99.9977%12 min · 8 outages
WPX Hosting
99.9969%16 min · 9 outages
WP Engine
99.9952%25 min · 1 outage
Rocket.net
99.9943%30 min · 2 outages
Hostinger
99.9937%33 min · 11 outages
Liquid Web
99.9880%63 min · 5 outages
Bluehost
99.9744%134 min · 14 outages
GreenGeeks
99.9737%138 min · 21 outages
Kinsta
99.9714%149 min · 5 outages
SiteGround
99.9629%193 min · 44 outages
DreamPress
99.9557%233 min · 16 outages
Hosting.com
99.9425%301 min · 49 outages
NameHero
99.9385%322 min · 51 outages
FastComet
99.9233%403 min · 39 outages
HostGator
99.9104%470 min · 19 outages
ChemiCloud
99.7559%1,282 min · 67 outages ⇢
⇢ bar exceeds the 600-minute axis; the value shown is the full figure.
Most reliable (99.99%+)
More reliable than most (99.95–99.98%)
Mid-pack (99.90–99.94%)
Less reliable than most (99.80–99.89%)
Below the 99.9% SLA line (under 99.80%)
Most shared hosts publish a 99.9% SLA, which allows up to 8 hours 46 minutes of downtime a year. Sixteen of 17 hosts met that line.
#HostingUptimeDowntimeTotal outages
1
Templ
99.9996%2 min1
2
Cloudways
99.9977%12 min8
3
WPX Hosting
99.9969%16 min9
4
WP Engine
99.9952%25 min1
5
Rocket.net
99.9943%30 min2
6
Hostinger
99.9937%33 min11
7
Liquid Web
99.9880%1h 3m5
8
Bluehost
99.9744%2h 14m14
9
GreenGeeks
99.9737%2h 18m21
10
Kinsta
99.9714%2h 29m5
11
SiteGround
99.9629%3h 13m44
12
DreamPress
99.9557%3h 53m16
13
Hosting.com
99.9425%5h 1m49
14
NameHero
99.9385%5h 22m51
15
FastComet
99.9233%6h 43m39
16
HostGator
99.9104%7h 50m19
17
ChemiCloud
99.7559%21h 22m67
Show full table

Zero hosts achieved 100% uptime in 2025. Templ came closest at 99.9996% with just 2 minutes of total downtime and a single outage. WP Engine’s only outage was a scheduled 25-minute maintenance window during its infrastructure upgrade; without it, WP Engine would have posted 100%.

The percentage hides the differences. Six hosts sit at 99.99%+, but their downtime ranges from 2 minutes (Templ) to 33 minutes (Hostinger) and their outage counts from 1 to 11. Hostinger’s 33 minutes is still the best result of any shared host in the pool.

Kinsta’s 149 minutes came from just 5 outages, most of them the 2025 Cloudflare incidents that sit in its infrastructure stack; it recorded 99.995% in 2023 and 99.999% in 2024. NameHero (51 outages), Hosting.com (49) and SiteGround (44) had the most frequent interruptions among hosts that still cleared the 99.9% line.

ChemiCloud is the only full-year host below the 99.9% line, and below its own 99.99% SLA: 67 outages, 1,282 minutes of downtime and a worst single day at 57.73% uptime, nearly 10 hours offline. HostGator’s worst day was 79.38% and FastComet’s 82.29%, roughly 5 and 4 hours down in a single day.

Uptime screenshots: full year 2025 (17 hosts)
Templ - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025Templ
Cloudways - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025Cloudways
WPX - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025WPX
WP Engine - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025WP Engine
Rocket.net - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025Rocket.net
Hostinger - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025Hostinger
Liquid Web - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025Liquid Web
Bluehost - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025Bluehost
GreenGeeks - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025GreenGeeks
Kinsta - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025Kinsta
SiteGround - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025SiteGround
DreamPress - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025DreamPress
Hosting.com - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025Hosting.com
NameHero - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025NameHero
FastComet - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025FastComet
HostGator - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025HostGator
ChemiCloud - Uptime screenshot, full year 2025ChemiCloud

Benchmark Test 3: Load Testing

The load test measures how each host handles sustained concurrent traffic. Loader.io sends 100 simultaneous clients to the entry-plan test site from AWS US-East for 60 seconds and records the average response time and error rate. It is a synthetic test run once under identical conditions, not a measurement of real visitor experience.

Load Test: 100 Concurrent Visitors
Loader.io · 100 simulated concurrent clients · 60 seconds · entry plan · bar = average response under load · lower is better
Pressable
12ms · 0% errors
WordPress.com
16ms · 0% errors
GreenGeeks
26ms · 0% errors
WP Engine
27ms · 0% errors
Hostinger Business
31ms · 0% errors
InMotionHosting
31ms · 0% errors
HostArmada
32ms · 0% errors
GoDaddy Managed WP
35ms · 0% errors
Kinsta
40ms · 0% errors
Bluehost
41ms · 0% errors
Hosting.com
43ms · 0% errors
WPX Hosting
45ms · 0% errors
ScalaHosting
48ms · 0% errors
Templ
58ms · 0% errors
Liquid Web
60ms · 0% errors
FastComet
78ms · 0% errors
Interserver
80ms · 0% errors
EasyWP
110ms · 0% errors
DreamHost (Shared)
147ms · 0% errors
NameCheap
150ms · 0% errors
SiteGround
170ms · 0% errors
HostGator
213ms · 2.0% errors
DreamPress
221ms · 0.1% errors
Hostinger
245ms · 0% errors
NameHero
257ms · 56% errors · ceiling ~80 users
Cloudways
282ms · 2% errors
ChemiCloud
1,068ms · 4.2% errors ⇢
Did not complete: stopped in the first 30 seconds (2 hosts)
Ionos
Did not complete · 65.4% errors
GoDaddy (Shared)
Did not complete · 68.8% errors
Not testable: security block (1 host)
Rocket.net
Cloudflare Enterprise blocked the test client · no result recorded
⇢ bar exceeds the 500ms axis; the value shown is the full figure.
Handles load best (under 50ms)
Better than most (50–100ms)
Mid-pack (100–250ms)
Slower than most (250–500ms)
Over 1 second
Did not complete
There is no Google threshold for a load test. Two things are objective: whether the host served every request (the error rate), and whether responses stayed under one second. “Did not complete” means the run stopped in the first 30 seconds at the tool’s error threshold, so no usable average was produced; it is not a verdict on the server.
#HostingAvg response timeError rate
1
Pressable
12ms0%
2
WordPress.com
16ms0%
3
GreenGeeks
26ms0%
4
WP Engine
27ms0%
5
Hostinger Business
31ms0%
6
InMotionHosting
31ms0%
7
HostArmada
32ms0%
8
GoDaddy Managed WP
35ms0%
9
Kinsta
40ms0%
10
Bluehost
41ms0%
11
Hosting.com
43ms0%
12
WPX Hosting
45ms0%
13
ScalaHosting
48ms0%
14
Templ
58ms0%
15
Liquid Web
60ms0%
16
FastComet
78ms0%
17
Interserver
80ms0%
18
EasyWP
110ms0%
19
DreamHost (Shared)
147ms0%
20
NameCheap
150ms0%
21
SiteGround
170ms0%
22
HostGator
213ms2.0%
23
DreamPress
221ms0.1%
24
Hostinger
245ms0%
25
NameHero
257ms56% · connection ceiling at ~80 concurrent users
26
Cloudways
282ms2%
27
ChemiCloud
1,068ms4.2%
Ionos
Did not complete65.4% · stopped in first 30s
GoDaddy (Shared)
Did not complete68.8% · stopped in first 30s
Rocket.net
Not testableSecurity block · no result recorded
Show full table

Pressable (12ms) and WordPress.com (16ms) record the fastest load-test responses of any host in our five years of testing. GreenGeeks at 26ms is the fastest shared host and is consistent year over year. Thirteen hosts finished under 50ms with zero errors, including three new entrants: InMotionHosting (31ms), HostArmada (32ms) and GoDaddy Managed WordPress (35ms).

Hostinger shows the CDN effect inside one brand: the Premium plan, tested without a CDN, averaged 245ms, while Hostinger Business with Hostinger CDN averaged 31ms on the same test. Cloudways at 282ms is a decline from previous years. ChemiCloud averaged 1,068ms with a 4.2% error rate, the only completed run over one second.

Three results carry a note. Bluehost’s December 2025 run was blocked by the security layer on its new Oracle Cloud and Cloudflare stack; a July 9, 2026 retest completed at 41ms with 0% errors and is the figure used throughout this report. WPX Hosting’s first run was blocked by WPX security; a July 8, 2026 retest completed at 45ms with 0% errors. Rocket.net’s Cloudflare Enterprise layer blocked the test client, so no result is recorded.

NameHero completed the full 60-second run at a 257ms average for served requests, but reached a connection ceiling at around 80 concurrent clients: 4,791 requests were served, while 6,076 network-level errors and 20 timeouts produced a 56% error rate, with no 4xx or 5xx responses. Ionos (65.4% errors) and GoDaddy Shared (68.8%) stopped in the first 30 seconds, so neither produced a usable average.

Load test screenshots (30 hosts)
Pressable - Load test screenshotPressable
WordPress.com - Load test screenshotWordPress.com
GreenGeeks - Load test screenshotGreenGeeks
WP Engine - Load test screenshotWP Engine
Hostinger Business - Load test screenshotHostinger Business
InMotion Hosting - Load test screenshotInMotion Hosting
HostArmada - Load test screenshotHostArmada
GoDaddy Managed WP - Load test screenshotGoDaddy Managed WP
Kinsta - Load test screenshotKinsta
Bluehost load test retest, July 9 2026: 41ms average, 0% errorsBluehost
Hosting.com - Load test screenshotHosting.com
ScalaHosting - Load test screenshotScalaHosting
WPX Hosting load test retest, July 8 2026: 45ms average, 0% errorsWPX
Templ - Load test screenshotTempl
Liquid Web - Load test screenshotLiquid Web
FastComet - Load test screenshotFastComet
InterServer - Load test screenshotInterServer
DreamHost - Load test screenshotDreamHost
NameCheap - Load test screenshotNameCheap
EasyWP load test retest, July 14 2026: 110ms average, 0% errorsEasyWP
SiteGround - Load test screenshotSiteGround
HostGator - Load test screenshotHostGator
DreamPress - Load test screenshotDreamPress
Hostinger - Load test screenshotHostinger
Cloudways - Load test screenshotCloudways
ChemiCloud - Load test screenshotChemiCloud
Rocket.net - Load test screenshotRocket.net
NameHero - Load test screenshotNameHero
Ionos - Load test screenshotIonos
GoDaddy - Load test screenshotGoDaddy

Benchmark Test 4: Server Hardware (WPBench)

The Hosting Benchmark Tool runs CPU, memory, filesystem and database tests on the server and produces a composite score from 0 to 10. It measures how much computing power a provider allocates to the plan we bought. A low score means the provider caps resources on the entry plan; it says nothing about the quality of their technology or the web server they run, and higher plans from the same provider may score differently.

WPBenchmark Server Hardware Score
Composite score 0–10 · allocated CPU, memory, filesystem and database throughput on the entry plan · higher is more
pool median 6.6
Bluehost
9.6/10
HostGator
9.6/10
ScalaHosting
8.8/10
Kinsta
8.8/10
SiteGround
8.4/10
Templ
7.5/10
Rocket.net
7.5/10
Hostinger Business
7.4/10
InMotionHosting
7.4/10
Hostinger
7.4/10
Liquid Web
7.2/10
Ionos
7.2/10
WordPress.com
6.8/10
Pressable
6.7/10
EasyWP
6.7/10
WP Engine
6.5/10
WPX Hosting
6.5/10
DreamHost (Shared)
6.1/10
DreamPress
6.1/10
ChemiCloud
6.1/10
Hosting.com
5.5/10
Interserver
5.3/10
HostArmada
5.1/10
GreenGeeks
5.0/10
NameCheap
5.0/10
FastComet
4.8/10
Cloudways
4.7/10
GoDaddy Managed WP
3.8/10
GoDaddy (Shared)
3.8/10
NameHero
3.7/10
Most resources allocated (9.0+)
More than most (7.0–8.9)
Mid-pack (6.0–6.9)
Fewer than most (5.0–5.9)
Fewest allocated (under 5.0)
No external pass mark exists for this test, so labels rank the 30 hosts against each other and the dashed line is the pool median.
#HostingWPBench score
1
Bluehost
9.6/10
2
HostGator
9.6/10
3
ScalaHosting
8.8/10
4
Kinsta
8.8/10
5
SiteGround
8.4/10
6
Templ
7.5/10
7
Rocket.net
7.5/10
8
Hostinger Business
7.4/10
9
InMotionHosting
7.4/10
10
Hostinger
7.4/10
11
Liquid Web
7.2/10
12
Ionos
7.2/10
13
WordPress.com
6.8/10
14
Pressable
6.7/10
15
EasyWP
6.7/10
16
WP Engine
6.5/10
17
WPX Hosting
6.5/10
18
DreamHost (Shared)
6.1/10
19
DreamPress
6.1/10
20
ChemiCloud
6.1/10
21
Hosting.com
5.5/10
22
Interserver
5.3/10
23
HostArmada
5.1/10
24
GreenGeeks
5.0/10
25
NameCheap
5.0/10
26
FastComet
4.8/10
27
Cloudways
4.7/10
28
GoDaddy Managed WP
3.8/10
29
GoDaddy (Shared)
3.8/10
30
NameHero
3.7/10
Show full table

Bluehost and HostGator jumped to 9.6 from 4.0 and 4.3 respectively, the largest year-over-year change in the pool, and it tracks their Oracle Cloud migration. Kinsta at 8.8 is consistent year over year and remains the only managed WordPress host allocating this much computing power for its price. ScalaHosting debuts at 8.8.

Rocket.net dropped below 8 for the first time, at 7.5. Hostinger Premium and Hostinger Business score the same 7.4, so the cheaper plan is not getting fewer resources. WordPress.com (6.8), Pressable (6.7), WP Engine (6.5) and WPX Hosting (6.5) all sit mid-pack; these hosts get their speed from caching architecture rather than raw allocation.

GoDaddy Managed WordPress scores 3.8 despite fast results in every other test, which points to a limited allocation masked by its edge-caching CDN. NameHero at 3.7 is the lowest in the pool.

Server benchmark screenshots (30 hosts)
Bluehost - Server benchmark screenshotBluehost
HostGator - Server benchmark screenshotHostGator
ScalaHosting - Server benchmark screenshotScalaHosting
Kinsta - Server benchmark screenshotKinsta
SiteGround - Server benchmark screenshotSiteGround
Templ - Server benchmark screenshotTempl
Rocket.net - Server benchmark screenshotRocket.net
Hostinger Business - Server benchmark screenshotHostinger Business
InMotion Hosting - Server benchmark screenshotInMotion Hosting
Hostinger - Server benchmark screenshotHostinger
Liquid Web - Server benchmark screenshotLiquid Web
Ionos - Server benchmark screenshotIonos
WordPress.com - Server benchmark screenshotWordPress.com
Pressable - Server benchmark screenshotPressable
EasyWP - Server benchmark screenshotEasyWP
WP Engine - Server benchmark screenshotWP Engine
WPX - Server benchmark screenshotWPX
DreamHost - Server benchmark screenshotDreamHost
DreamPress - Server benchmark screenshotDreamPress
ChemiCloud - Server benchmark screenshotChemiCloud
Hosting.com - Server benchmark screenshotHosting.com
InterServer - Server benchmark screenshotInterServer
HostArmada - Server benchmark screenshotHostArmada
GreenGeeks - Server benchmark screenshotGreenGeeks
NameCheap - Server benchmark screenshotNameCheap
FastComet - Server benchmark screenshotFastComet
Cloudways - Server benchmark screenshotCloudways
GoDaddy Managed WP - Server benchmark screenshotGoDaddy Managed WP
GoDaddy - Server benchmark screenshotGoDaddy
NameHero - Server benchmark screenshotNameHero

Benchmark Test 5: Global TTFB

Global TTFB measures how each host performs for visitors outside the US. Every test site sits in a US data center, so for a host without a CDN this number mostly measures how far the visitor is from the origin, not how fast the server is. SpeedVitals pings the cached test page from 40 locations: 13 in the Americas, 11 in Europe and 16 across Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and Africa. Google’s 800ms line is the only absolute mark on this chart.

Global TTFB
SpeedVitals · 40 worldwide locations · cached response · point-in-time test · all test sites on US data centres · lower is better
Google “good” ceiling 800ms
WP Engine
65ms · edge CDN
Rocket.net
66ms · edge CDN
WordPress.com
69ms · edge CDN
Pressable
74ms · edge CDN
GoDaddy Managed WP
75ms · edge CDN
Templ
167ms · edge CDN
Bluehost
224ms · static CDN
WPX
240ms · edge CDN
Liquid Web
349ms · static CDN
Hostinger Business
351ms · static CDN
DreamHost
385ms · no CDN
Cloudways
386ms · no CDN
GreenGeeks
386ms · no CDN
FastComet
387ms · no CDN
InMotionHosting
390ms · no CDN
HostArmada
402ms · no CDN
Hostinger
404ms · no CDN
HostGator
427ms · static CDN
ScalaHosting
442ms · static CDN
NameCheap
448ms · no CDN
NameHero
448ms · no CDN
ChemiCloud
460ms · no CDN
Kinsta
477ms · edge CDN
Ionos
480ms · no CDN
EasyWP
534ms · static CDN
Hosting.com
642ms · no CDN
GoDaddy
689ms · no CDN
DreamPress
726ms · static CDN
InterServer
789ms · no CDN
SiteGround
1,200ms · static CDN
Fastest worldwide (under 250ms)
Faster than most (250–500ms)
Mid-pack (500–650ms)
Slower than most (650–800ms)
Above Google’s 800ms ceiling
SiteGround at 1,200ms is the only host above Google’s 800ms ceiling; labels rank the other 29 against each other.
#HostingGlobal TTFBCDN type
1
WP Engine
65msedge CDN
2
Rocket.net
66msedge CDN
3
WordPress.com
69msedge CDN
4
Pressable
74msedge CDN
5
GoDaddy Managed WP
75msedge CDN
6
Templ
167msedge CDN
7
Bluehost
224msstatic CDN
8
WPX
240msedge CDN
9
Liquid Web
349msstatic CDN
10
Hostinger Business
351msstatic CDN
11
DreamHost
385msno CDN
12
Cloudways
386msno CDN
13
GreenGeeks
386msno CDN
14
FastComet
387msno CDN
15
InMotionHosting
390msno CDN
16
HostArmada
402msno CDN
17
Hostinger
404msno CDN
18
HostGator
427msstatic CDN
19
ScalaHosting
442msstatic CDN
20
NameCheap
448msno CDN
21
NameHero
448msno CDN
22
ChemiCloud
460msno CDN
23
Kinsta
477msedge CDN
24
Ionos
480msno CDN
25
EasyWP
534msstatic CDN
26
Hosting.com
642msno CDN
27
GoDaddy
689msno CDN
28
DreamPress
726msstatic CDN
29
InterServer
789msno CDN
30
SiteGround
1,200msstatic CDN
Show full table

Every host under 200ms runs an edge-caching CDN. WP Engine leads at 65ms on Cloudflare Enterprise; Rocket.net (66ms) and GoDaddy Managed WordPress (75ms) also run Cloudflare edge, while WordPress.com (69ms) and Pressable (74ms) use their own in-house CDN. Templ at 167ms is the only Google Cloud CDN host in the pool. Bluehost (224ms) is the one static-CDN host inside the fastest band, and WPX Hosting (240ms) completes it on its own XDN edge infrastructure.

The 250–500ms band holds 16 hosts, most of them tested with no CDN at all. DreamHost, Cloudways and GreenGeeks at 385–386ms are doing what physics allows from a US origin. Liquid Web (349ms) and Hostinger Business (351ms) lead the static-CDN hosts. Kinsta at 477ms is the outlier: the slowest edge-caching host, and slower than three hosts with no CDN.

EasyWP (534ms) uses a static CDN yet trails its parent brand NameCheap (448ms), which was tested without one. SiteGround at 1,200ms is the only host above Google’s 800ms line, even though it was tested with its own CDN enabled; that is 18x slower than WP Engine, and visitors far from the US origin will feel that gap most. InterServer at 789ms sits just inside the line.

Takeaway: if most of your visitors are outside the US, an edge-caching host is the single largest global speed upgrade available. Otherwise, pick a data center near your audience; without a CDN, visitors far from that one location accept the latency.

Global TTFB screenshots (29 hosts)
WP Engine - Global TTFB screenshotWP Engine
WordPress.com - Global TTFB screenshotWordPress.com
Pressable - Global TTFB screenshotPressable
Templ - Global TTFB screenshotTempl
GoDaddy Managed WP - Global TTFB screenshotGoDaddy Managed WP
Rocket.net - Global TTFB screenshotRocket.net
Bluehost - Global TTFB screenshotBluehost
Liquid Web - Global TTFB screenshotLiquid Web
Cloudways - Global TTFB screenshotCloudways
ScalaHosting - Global TTFB screenshotScalaHosting
GreenGeeks - Global TTFB screenshotGreenGeeks
NameCheap - Global TTFB screenshotNameCheap
InMotion Hosting - Global TTFB screenshotInMotion Hosting
Hostinger - Global TTFB screenshotHostinger
DreamHost - Global TTFB screenshotDreamHost
FastComet - Global TTFB screenshotFastComet
HostGator - Global TTFB screenshotHostGator
EasyWP - Global TTFB screenshotEasyWP
Kinsta - Global TTFB screenshotKinsta
Ionos - Global TTFB screenshotIonos
ChemiCloud - Global TTFB screenshotChemiCloud
Hostinger Business - Global TTFB screenshotHostinger Business
HostArmada - Global TTFB screenshotHostArmada
NameHero - Global TTFB screenshotNameHero
WPX - Global TTFB screenshotWPX
GoDaddy - Global TTFB screenshotGoDaddy
Hosting.com - Global TTFB screenshotHosting.com
SiteGround - Global TTFB screenshotSiteGround
InterServer - Global TTFB screenshotInterServer

New Entrants: Q4 2025 Early Data

On October 1, 2025 we started monitoring 13 additional providers. Their load test, WPBench and global TTFB results appear in the charts above alongside the full-year hosts. TTFB and uptime below cover Q4 2025 only (October 1 – December 31, 92 days, 132,480 tests per host), so read them as an early signal; the full-year figures will appear in the 2027 report.

Q4 2025 TTFB, New Entrants
October 1 – December 31, 2025 · 92 days · 132,480 tests per provider · lower is better
pool median 465ms
Google “good” ceiling 800ms
Pressable
341ms
WordPress.com
357ms
GoDaddy Managed WP
361ms
HostArmada
454ms
NameCheap
462ms
Interserver
462ms
ScalaHosting
465ms
Hostinger Business
478ms
EasyWP
490ms
DreamHost (Shared)
495ms
InMotionHosting
537ms
Ionos
545ms
GoDaddy (Shared)
751ms
Fastest tested (under 400ms)
Faster than most (400–500ms)
Mid-pack (500–550ms)
Slower than most (550–650ms)
Slowest tested (over 650ms)
Q4 2025 Uptime, New Entrants
October 1 – December 31, 2025 · 92 days · bar = total downtime in minutes · shorter is better
99.9% SLA = 132 min
Pressable
100.00%0 min · 0 outages
WordPress.com
100.00%0 min · 0 outages
EasyWP
100.00%0 min · 0 outages
Interserver
99.99%2 min · 2 outages
GoDaddy (Shared)
99.99%4 min · 4 outages
Ionos
99.99%8 min · 4 outages
InMotionHosting
99.99%9 min · 6 outages
Hostinger Business
99.98%18 min · 4 outages
NameCheap
99.98%21 min · 1 outage
GoDaddy Managed WP
99.98%24 min · 2 outages
ScalaHosting
99.97%27 min · 15 outages
HostArmada
99.97%28 min · 6 outages
DreamHost (Shared)
99.96%26 min · 3 outages
Most reliable (99.99%+)
More reliable than most (99.95–99.98%)
Mid-pack (99.90–99.94%)
Less reliable than most (99.80–99.89%)
Below the 99.9% SLA line (under 99.80%)

The table below collects all five tests for the new entrants. The early-signal grade uses the same percentile scale as the full-year report card; Ionos and GoDaddy Shared receive no grade because their load tests did not complete.

HostingTTFBUptimeDowntime · outagesLoad testWPBenchGlobal TTFBEarly signal
Pressable
341ms100.00%0 min · 012ms · 0%6.7/1074msA+
WordPress.com
357ms100.00%0 min · 016ms · 0%6.8/1069msA+
GoDaddy Managed WP
361ms99.98%24 min · 235ms · 0%3.8/1075msB+
HostArmada
454ms99.97%28 min · 632ms · 0%5.1/10402msB+
NameCheap
462ms99.98%21 min · 1150ms · 0%5.0/10448msD
Interserver
462ms99.99%2 min · 280ms · 0%5.3/10789msC
ScalaHosting
465ms99.97%27 min · 1548ms · 0%8.8/10442msA
Hostinger Business
478ms99.98%18 min · 431ms · 0%7.4/10351msA
EasyWP
490ms100.00%0 min · 0110ms · 0%6.7/10534msC
DreamHost (Shared)
495ms99.96%26 min · 3147ms · 0%6.1/10385msB
InMotionHosting
537ms99.99%9 min · 631ms · 0%7.4/10390msB
Ionos
545ms99.99%8 min · 4Did not complete · 65.4% errors7.2/10480msn/a
GoDaddy (Shared)
751ms99.99%4 min · 4Did not complete · 68.8% errors3.8/10689msn/a

Pressable (341ms), WordPress.com (357ms) and GoDaddy Managed WordPress (361ms) all post fastest-band TTFB and are the strongest challengers to WP Engine and Rocket.net once they have a full year of data. GoDaddy’s two products diverge sharply: its Managed WordPress is 2x faster than its shared hosting (751ms), two different infrastructure stacks under one brand.

Pressable, WordPress.com and EasyWP recorded 100% uptime for the quarter. Pressable and WordPress.com publish 100% and 99.999% SLAs respectively; EasyWP is the surprise, having averaged 99.96% in our 2022–23 monitoring. Every new entrant cleared the 99.9% line. The widest gap is ScalaHosting’s 15 outages in 92 days against a single outage for NameCheap.

Pressable and WordPress.com earn A+ in four of five tests and are positioned to join the A+ ranks in next year’s benchmarks if this holds. Hostinger Business and ScalaHosting grade A. GoDaddy Managed WordPress earns A+ in both TTFB tests, but its D in WPBench shows limited server resources behind the fast CDN.

TTFB screenshots: Q4 2025 hosts (13 hosts)
Pressable - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025Pressable
WordPress.com - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025WordPress.com
GoDaddy Managed WP - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025GoDaddy Managed WP
HostArmada - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025HostArmada
NameCheap - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025NameCheap
InterServer - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025InterServer
ScalaHosting - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025ScalaHosting
Hostinger Business - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025Hostinger Business
EasyWP - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025EasyWP
DreamHost - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025DreamHost
InMotion Hosting - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025InMotion Hosting
Ionos - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025Ionos
GoDaddy - TTFB screenshot, Q4 2025GoDaddy
Uptime screenshots: Q4 2025 hosts (13 hosts)
Pressable - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025Pressable
WordPress.com - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025WordPress.com
EasyWP - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025EasyWP
InMotion Hosting - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025InMotion Hosting
InterServer - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025InterServer
Ionos - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025Ionos
GoDaddy - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025GoDaddy
GoDaddy Managed WP - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025GoDaddy Managed WP
Hostinger Business - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025Hostinger Business
NameCheap - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025NameCheap
ScalaHosting - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025ScalaHosting
HostArmada - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025HostArmada
DreamHost - Uptime screenshot, Q4 2025DreamHost

Beyond the Benchmarks: Analysis

TTFB Range (Consistency)

Average TTFB tells you how fast a host typically responds; it does not tell you how predictable that is. A host averaging 450ms every day is more useful than one averaging 380ms that spikes to 1,500ms. TTFB range is the difference between a host’s highest and lowest daily-average TTFB across the year, calculated for the 17 full-year hosts.

TTFB Consistency: Range (Max minus Min)
365 days of data · range between the highest and lowest daily-average TTFB · lower range = more predictable performance
WP Engine
244ms
NameHero
266ms
GreenGeeks
308ms
Cloudways
314ms
Liquid Web
337ms
Hostinger
432ms
Bluehost
459ms
Kinsta
567ms
WPX Hosting
590ms
FastComet
611ms
Hosting.com
619ms
Rocket.net
639ms
Templ
666ms
DreamPress
843ms
HostGator
1,310ms
SiteGround
1,619ms
ChemiCloud
1,673ms
Tightest range (under 350ms)
Mid-range (350–1,000ms)
Widest range (over 1,000ms)
A relative measure with no external standard. A wide range usually reflects a few spike days, so read it together with the average.
#HostingAvg TTFBMin TTFBMax TTFBRange
1
WP Engine
365ms259ms503ms244ms
2
NameHero
476ms393ms659ms266ms
3
GreenGeeks
422ms340ms648ms308ms
4
Cloudways
449ms352ms666ms314ms
5
Liquid Web
497ms366ms703ms337ms
6
Hostinger
483ms367ms799ms432ms
7
Bluehost
532ms396ms855ms459ms
8
Kinsta
459ms371ms938ms567ms
9
WPX Hosting
411ms282ms872ms590ms
10
FastComet
521ms390ms1,001ms611ms
11
Hosting.com
470ms362ms981ms619ms
12
Rocket.net
373ms270ms909ms639ms
13
Templ
386ms282ms948ms666ms
14
DreamPress
663ms454ms1,297ms843ms
15
HostGator
580ms453ms1,763ms1,310ms
16
SiteGround
632ms502ms2,121ms1,619ms
17
ChemiCloud
528ms370ms2,043ms1,673ms
Show full table

WP Engine is the most consistent host in the pool: its slowest day (503ms) was less than double its fastest (259ms), and combined with a single outage it delivers the most predictable numbers in the industry. NameHero’s 266ms range is the second tightest, followed by GreenGeeks, Cloudways and Liquid Web, all under 350ms.

Rocket.net and Templ rank in the top three for average TTFB but show wider ranges (639ms and 666ms), so their fast average comes with more day-to-day variation. ChemiCloud’s worst day (2,043ms) was 5.5x its best (370ms); SiteGround (1,619ms range) and HostGator (1,310ms) tell similar stories of wide performance swings.

CDN Impact: How Much Does CDN Type Matter?

Grouping all 30 hosts by CDN type against their global TTFB shows where the advantage actually comes from.

Edge caching CDN 8 hosts: serves the complete HTML page from the nearest edge location. WP Engine, Rocket.net, Templ, Kinsta, WPX Hosting, Pressable, WordPress.com, GoDaddy Managed WP.

Static asset CDN 8 hosts: serves images, CSS and JS from the CDN, but HTML still routes to the origin. Bluehost, HostGator, DreamPress, EasyWP, Hostinger Business, Liquid Web, ScalaHosting, SiteGround.

Origin only 14 hosts: no CDN; every request routes to the origin server. Cloudways, DreamHost (Shared), GreenGeeks, Hosting.com, Hostinger, ChemiCloud, FastComet, NameHero, HostArmada, NameCheap, InMotionHosting, Interserver, Ionos, GoDaddy (Shared).

CDN typeAvg global TTFBMedianRangeHosts
Edge caching154ms75ms65–477ms8
Static asset CDN532ms435ms224–1,200ms8
Origin only478ms426ms385–789ms14

Edge-caching hosts (154ms) are 3x faster than static-CDN (532ms) or no-CDN hosts (478ms). The more striking finding is that static-asset CDN hosts are no faster than origin-only hosts: on the median the two groups sit within 10ms of each other (435ms vs 426ms). Serving images and CSS from an edge location provides no measurable advantage when the HTML document itself still travels from the origin. The bottleneck is the HTML response, and only edge caching removes that round trip.

Cloudways (386ms), with no CDN, outperforms four of the eight static-CDN hosts: HostGator, EasyWP, ScalaHosting and SiteGround. GreenGeeks (386ms), also with no CDN, is 3x faster than SiteGround’s static CDN (1,200ms) and slightly faster than HostGator’s (427ms). Even among edge-caching hosts the spread is wide: Kinsta (477ms) trails both GreenGeeks and Cloudways despite running Cloudflare edge infrastructure. Architecture sets the ceiling; implementation quality and origin performance decide where each host lands beneath it.

Takeaway for site owners: if your site serves visitors outside your data center region, an edge-caching CDN is the highest-impact upgrade you can make. On the group averages, a host like HostGator could gain roughly 270ms by moving from a static-asset CDN to edge caching. A static-asset CDN, despite the marketing around it, does not produce faster global page loads than having no CDN at all.

Shared vs Managed WordPress Hosting

Nine shared and eight managed WordPress hosts were tested for the full year. Managed: WP Engine, Rocket.net, Templ, WPX Hosting, Kinsta, Cloudways, DreamPress, Liquid Web. Shared: GreenGeeks, Hosting.com, Hostinger, Bluehost, SiteGround, ChemiCloud, FastComet, NameHero, HostGator.

MetricManaged WordPress (8)Shared hosting (9)Gap
Average TTFB450ms516msShared is 66ms slower (14.7%)
Average uptime99.9873%99.9306%67 min vs 365 min of downtime a year
Average outages/year5.935.0Shared hosts see 6x more outages
Typical price$15–35/month$2.95–5/monthManaged costs 5–10x more

The TTFB gap between managed and shared hosting is just 66ms. The real gap is reliability: shared hosts averaged 35 outages a year against 5.9 for managed, and outage frequency is what decides how often your site is interrupted. GreenGeeks at $2.95/month, with 422ms TTFB and a 26ms load test, outperforms several managed hosts costing $25–30 a month on speed alone.

When managed hosting is justified: e-commerce, critical business sites and news publishers, where downtime costs revenue and the 6x reliability gap pays for itself. When shared hosting delivers: blogs, small business sites and content sites, where the top shared hosts give 85–90% of managed speed at 80% lower cost. The data does not support “managed is always better”; it supports “managed is more stable, and the premium is worth paying when downtime costs you money.”

WordPress Hosting Performance Stats 2026

Testing scale
525,600 TTFB and uptime checks per provider per year
19 North American monitoring locations at 60-second intervals
30 WordPress hosting providers monitored in 2025
5+ years of continuous data for the original cohort
Industry-wide, 17 full-year hosts
Average TTFB 485ms; only 3 of 17 (17.6%) under 400ms
Average uptime 99.9573%; 6 of 17 (35.3%) at 99.99% or better
Combined downtime 63.4 hours across 362 outage events
Same 17 hosts: average TTFB rose from 383ms (2023) to 485ms (2025), a 26.6% slowdown
Most improved: HostGator (789ms → 580ms, −26.5%). Most consistent: Liquid Web (28.6ms std dev over 5 years)

All Tested WordPress Hosting Providers

Every host in one place. Each card shows the five headline figures; open a card for our reading of the numbers and a link to the full review.

WP EngineA+
TTFB365ms
Uptime99.9952%
Load test27ms
Global TTFB65ms
WPBench6.5/10

WP Engine reclaims #1 in TTFB for the first time since our monitoring began in 2020, and records the tightest year-long consistency of any host (244ms range) alongside the fastest global TTFB (65ms) and a 27ms load test. The one gap is server-side resource allocation, with a WPBench score of 6.5; benchmark before committing a plugin-heavy WooCommerce site.

See our full WP Engine review
TemplA+
TTFB386ms
Uptime99.9996%
Load test58ms
Global TTFB167ms
WPBench7.5/10

Templ is the most consistent performer year over year and the only host in our pool running Google Cloud, Google CDN and Google DNS together. A 167ms global TTFB and a 7.5 WPBench score on a $15 plan are strong; the 58ms load test trails Pressable and WP Engine.

See our full Templ review
GreenGeeksA+
TTFB422ms
Uptime99.9737%
Load test26ms
Global TTFB386ms
WPBench5.0/10

GreenGeeks is the best-balanced shared host in the report card, with no failing grade in any test and a 26ms load-test response that beats every other shared host we have tested in five years. The trade-off is outage frequency: 21 outages (138 minutes) across the year, and a 5.0 WPBench score on the Lite plan we tested.

See our full GreenGeeks review
KinstaA
TTFB459ms
Uptime99.9714%
Load test40ms
Global TTFB477ms
WPBench8.8/10

Kinsta holds the highest WPBench score of any managed WordPress host (8.8) for the fifth consecutive year and handles load at 40ms with zero errors. Its two weak spots are a 477ms global TTFB, slow for an edge-caching host, and 149 minutes of downtime tied to the 2025 Cloudflare outages.

See our full Kinsta review
Liquid WebA
TTFB497ms
Uptime99.9880%
Load test60ms
Global TTFB349ms
WPBench7.2/10

Liquid Web is the most predictable host in our five-year dataset, with a TTFB standard deviation of just 28.6ms from 2021 to 2025. Load handling (60ms), uptime and WPBench (7.2) are equally steady, and a 349ms global TTFB is a respectable result for a static CDN.

See our full Liquid Web review
HostingerB+
TTFB483ms
Uptime99.9937%
Load test245ms
Global TTFB404ms
WPBench7.4/10

Hostinger recorded just 33 minutes of downtime in 2025, the best uptime of any shared host we benchmarked, and the highest shared-host WPBench score at 7.4. The 245ms load test is the trade-off: the Premium plan we tested has no CDN, while the Hostinger Business plan with Hostinger CDN handled the same test at 31ms.

See our full Hostinger review
BluehostB+
TTFB532ms
Uptime99.9744%
Load test41ms
Global TTFB224ms
WPBench9.6/10

Bluehost’s 2025 numbers split into pre- and post-Oracle Cloud migration. After we moved the test site in Q4 2025 it recorded its first 100% uptime quarter in five years of testing and the pool’s highest WPBench score (9.6), while Cloudflare CDN brought global TTFB down to 224ms. The 532ms origin TTFB blends old and new infrastructure; the July 9, 2026 load retest completed at 41ms with 0% errors.

See our full Bluehost review
WPX HostingB+
TTFB411ms
Uptime99.9969%
Load test45ms
Global TTFB240ms
WPBench6.5/10

WPX Hosting delivers a 240ms global TTFB through its own XDN edge caching, with near-perfect uptime (16 minutes of downtime) and a TTFB that has stayed consistent across the years. The first Loader.io run was blocked by WPX security; a July 8, 2026 retest completed at 45ms with 0% errors.

See our full WPX Hosting review
CloudwaysB
TTFB449ms
Uptime99.9977%
Load test282ms
Global TTFB386ms
WPBench4.7/10

Cloudways recorded just 12 minutes of downtime in 2025, the second-best uptime in the pool, and its TTFB has stayed within a narrow band for five years. The 282ms load test and 4.7 WPBench score both declined from previous years and are why it grades B rather than A.

See our full Cloudways review
Hosting.comB
TTFB470ms
Uptime99.9425%
Load test43ms
Global TTFB642ms
WPBench5.5/10

Hosting.com (formerly A2 Hosting) improved its WPBench score from 3.4 to 5.5 after moving to its new data centers and handles load at 43ms. Uptime was its weakest metric, with 49 outages totaling 301 minutes, and a 642ms global TTFB reflects origin-only delivery.

See our full Hosting.com review
FastCometC
TTFB521ms
Uptime99.9233%
Load test78ms
Global TTFB387ms
WPBench4.8/10

FastComet handles load at 78ms with zero errors, but uptime is a concern: 39 outages in 2025 and a worst single-day uptime of 82.29%. Its TTFB has climbed from 326ms in 2022 to 521ms in 2025, and a 4.8 WPBench score sits below similarly priced competitors.

See our full FastComet review
SiteGroundC
TTFB632ms
Uptime99.9629%
Load test170ms
Global TTFB1,200ms
WPBench8.4/10

SiteGround allocates the second-highest server resources of any shared host (WPBench 8.4), but most other metrics rank near the bottom. Its 1,200ms global TTFB is the slowest of all 30 hosts even with its own CDN enabled, TTFB has regressed from 403ms in 2022 to 632ms, and 44 outages were recorded in 2025.

See our full SiteGround review
DreamPressC
TTFB663ms
Uptime99.9557%
Load test221ms
Global TTFB726ms
WPBench6.1/10

DreamPress recorded its weakest results since our monitoring began. TTFB regressed from 437ms in 2024 to 663ms, the slowest full-year host; the 221ms load test is the slowest of any managed host; and a 726ms global TTFB sits in the slower-than-most band despite a static CDN. DreamHost’s own shared plan is faster on every speed metric at a fraction of the price.

See our full DreamPress review
ChemiCloudD
TTFB528ms
Uptime99.7559%
Load test1,068ms
Global TTFB460ms
WPBench6.1/10

ChemiCloud recorded 99.7559% uptime in 2025, below its own 99.99% SLA, with 67 outages and over 21 hours of downtime, the most in the pool. The load test averaged 1,068ms with a 4.2% error rate. Two positives: a 460ms global TTFB without a CDN, and a WPBench improvement from 3.5 to 6.1 after its server upgrade.

See our full ChemiCloud review
NameHeroD
TTFB476ms
Uptime99.9385%
Load test257ms (56% errors)
Global TTFB448ms
WPBench3.7/10

NameHero delivers the second-tightest TTFB consistency in the pool (266ms range), so day-to-day response times are predictable. Reliability is the larger factor: 51 outages totaling 322 minutes in 2025. The load test reached a connection ceiling at around 80 concurrent users, averaging 257ms for completed requests with a 56% error rate, and the 3.7 WPBench score reflects limited resource allocation on the Starter Cloud plan.

See our full NameHero review
HostGatorF
TTFB580ms
Uptime99.9104%
Load test213ms (2.0% errors)
Global TTFB427ms
WPBench9.6/10

HostGator’s Oracle Cloud migration produced a clear improvement: TTFB dropped from 789ms to 580ms (26.5%) and WPBench jumped from 4.3 to 9.6. Reliability did not follow: 470 minutes of downtime, a worst day at 79.38% uptime, and a load test that spiked to 10,002ms under full load before settling at 213ms with 2.0% errors.

See our full HostGator review
Rocket.net
TTFB373ms
Uptime99.9943%
Load testN/A (security block)
Global TTFB66ms
WPBench7.5/10

Rocket.net has posted fastest-band TTFB for five consecutive years, the only host in our benchmarks with that record, and its 66ms global TTFB is the second fastest of all 30 hosts. Uptime is near perfect at two outages and WPBench stands at 7.5. TTFB has climbed gradually from 266ms in 2021 to 373ms in 2025, and the load test could not run because Cloudflare Enterprise blocked the test client.

See our full Rocket.net review
PressableQ4 2025 data
TTFB341ms
Uptime100.00%
Load test12ms
Global TTFB74ms
WPBench6.7/10

Pressable recorded the fastest load-test response in the entire 2026 benchmarks (12ms), 100% uptime across Q4 2025, and a 74ms global TTFB on its own CDN and DNS infrastructure rather than Cloudflare. WPBench of 6.7 sits mid-pack; the full-year data will show whether these speeds hold.

See our full Pressable review
WordPress.comQ4 2025 data
TTFB357ms
Uptime100.00%
Load test16ms
Global TTFB69ms
WPBench6.8/10

WordPress.com shares Pressable’s infrastructure and delivered a 69ms global TTFB (third fastest of 30 hosts), a 16ms load test and 100% Q4 uptime. The plan costs $2.75 per month and renews at the same price.

See our full WordPress.com review
GoDaddy Managed WPQ4 2025 data
TTFB361ms
Uptime99.98%
Load test35ms
Global TTFB75ms
WPBench3.8/10

GoDaddy Managed WordPress posted a 75ms global TTFB (fifth fastest of 30), a 35ms load test with zero errors and 99.98% uptime. Its 3.8 WPBench score shows the speed comes from the edge-caching CDN rather than server resources.

See our full GoDaddy Managed WP review
GoDaddy (Shared)Q4 2025 data
TTFB751ms
Uptime99.99%
Load testDid not complete (68.8% errors)
Global TTFB689ms
WPBench3.8/10

GoDaddy’s shared plan produced very different results from its managed product: 751ms TTFB, a load test that did not complete (68.8% errors) and a 689ms global TTFB. Uptime of 99.99% was the one strong result.

HostArmadaQ4 2025 data
TTFB454ms
Uptime99.97%
Load test32ms
Global TTFB402ms
WPBench5.1/10

HostArmada is one of the most promising new entrants: the tightest TTFB range of the Q4 hosts (204ms), a 32ms load test with zero errors and a 402ms global TTFB with no CDN. WPBench of 5.1 sits in the fewer-than-most band, and 6 outages (28 minutes) in the quarter is adequate.

See our full HostArmada review
Hostinger BusinessQ4 2025 data
TTFB478ms
Uptime99.98%
Load test31ms
Global TTFB351ms
WPBench7.4/10

Hostinger Business shows what a CDN changes within one brand: the same 7.4 WPBench score as the Premium plan, but a 31ms load test instead of 245ms and a 351ms global TTFB on Hostinger CDN.

See our full Hostinger Business review
InMotionHostingQ4 2025 data
TTFB537ms
Uptime99.99%
Load test31ms
Global TTFB390ms
WPBench7.4/10

InMotionHosting posted a 7.4 WPBench score, a 31ms load test with zero errors, 99.99% uptime and a 390ms global TTFB with no CDN. The 537ms origin TTFB is the one mid-pack result.

InterserverQ4 2025 data
TTFB462ms
Uptime99.99%
Load test80ms
Global TTFB789ms
WPBench5.3/10

InterServer recorded just 2 minutes of downtime across the 92-day window, among the best of the Q4 hosts, with a 462ms TTFB and an 80ms load test. The 789ms global TTFB is the trade-off, sitting just inside Google’s 800ms line.

IonosQ4 2025 data
TTFB545ms
Uptime99.99%
Load testDid not complete (65.4% errors)
Global TTFB480ms
WPBench7.2/10

Ionos allocates competitive resources (WPBench 7.2), held 99.99% uptime and posted a 480ms global TTFB. The load test did not complete, stopping at a 65.4% error rate within the first 30 seconds.

NameCheapQ4 2025 data
TTFB462ms
Uptime99.98%
Load test150ms
Global TTFB448ms
WPBench5.0/10

NameCheap delivered a predictable 462ms TTFB with a single outage in Q4 2025 and a 448ms global TTFB with no CDN. The 150ms load test and 5.0 WPBench score are mid-pack: the Stellar plan handles traffic but is not tuned for speed.

ScalaHostingQ4 2025 data
TTFB465ms
Uptime99.97%
Load test48ms
Global TTFB442ms
WPBench8.8/10

ScalaHosting posted an 8.8 WPBench score, the highest of any shared host apart from Bluehost and HostGator, and a 48ms load test with zero errors. Consistency is the question: TTFB spiked to 1,195ms on its worst day, and 15 outages in 92 days is elevated.

See our full ScalaHosting review
EasyWPQ4 2025 data
TTFB490ms
Uptime100.00%
Load test110ms
Global TTFB534ms
WPBench6.7/10

EasyWP recorded 100% uptime in Q4 2025 and the second-tightest TTFB range among the new entrants (243ms). A July 14, 2026 retest completed the load test at 110ms with 0% errors, and the 534ms global TTFB sits mid-pack despite a static CDN.

See our full EasyWP review
DreamHost (Shared)Q4 2025 data
TTFB495ms
Uptime99.96%
Load test147ms
Global TTFB385ms
WPBench6.1/10

DreamHost’s shared plan beats its own managed DreamPress product on TTFB (495ms vs 663ms), global TTFB (385ms vs 726ms) and load handling (147ms vs 221ms) at a fraction of the price, with three outages in the quarter.

Retests, Corrections and Changelog

Any hosting provider can report a configuration error or request a retest of any point-in-time test on this page. Retests run under the identical conditions described in each section and are published here with a dated entry.

September 2, 2026: Report restructured for readability. Key findings and the report card moved to the top; tier-badge lists removed from every test (the chart legend carries the bands); ten per-chart “how to read” boxes consolidated into the How We Tested section; Q4 2025 entrants consolidated into one section with a combined table; provider cards collapsed by default. Data corrections: load-test table re-sorted with ChemiCloud added to the chart; DreamPress added to the global TTFB table; DreamPress 2024 TTFB corrected to 437ms; InterServer Q4 TTFB aligned to 462ms.

September 2026: Scoring standard v2.1 applied: labels describe position in the tested pool; Google’s 800ms TTFB threshold and the 99.9% SLA line are drawn on every chart where they apply; “Did not complete” replaces “Failed” for load tests that stopped at the tool’s error threshold. Report-card overall grades recomputed as the average of the five test grades.

July 14, 2026: EasyWP load test retested: 110ms, 0% errors.

July 9, 2026: Bluehost load test retested after the December 2025 run was blocked by their security layer: 41ms, 0% errors.

July 8, 2026: WPX Hosting load test retested after the first run was blocked by WPX security: 45ms, 0% errors.

This HostingStep benchmark report is generated from 365 days of performance data collected for the main cohort (January 1 – December 31, 2025); newly added providers are tested with Q4 2025 data only. All hosting accounts are independently purchased by HostingStep and the invoices can be verified from this link. For methodology details, visit our Methodology page. For quarterly performance updates, check our Best WordPress Hosting roundup.

About Author

Default image
Mohan Raj View Profile
Mohan Raj is the founder of Hostingstep.com. He reviews web hosting providers by purchasing hosting accounts with his own funds and testing them 24/7, 365 days a year. He runs 525,600 performance tests a year, covering TTFB speed, uptime, load handling, Core Web Vitals and hardware benchmarks. With that data, he writes transparent hosting reviews and makes every performance figure publicly verifiable, earning the trust of Hostingstep.com visitors.