SiteGround Review 2025
SiteGround is the most popular web hosting provider in the industry. In this review, I talk in detail about SiteGround performance data obtained from our test sites and also the imporant factors like feautres, pricing and support,etc.
Our SiteGround Testing Approach
We’ve been monitoring SiteGround since August 2020, and with this review we are using the 2024 dataset.
SiteGround Website Configuration
- WordPress Twenty Twenty-Four Theme
- Standard plugins: Akismet, Contact Form 7, Rank Math
- Speed Optimizer by SiteGround plugin to enable caching
- Identical content across all other test hosts
Performance Metrics
- TTFB: 22 North American locations via Pingdom
- Uptime: 60-second interval continuous monitoring
- Load Testing: 100 concurrent users via Loader.io
- Global TTFB: 40 international locations
- WPBenchmark for server hardware assessment
Data Collection
- 43,800 TTFB tests conducted monthly
- Full 12-month period data analysis
- Statistical outlier removal for accuracy
- Comparison against 15+ other WordPress hosts
Transparency
- Independently purchased SiteGround hosting plan
- Purchase invoice published for verification
- Testing conducted without provider knowledge
- Ratings never influenced by affiliate commissions
Executive SiteGround Summary
Executive SiteGround Summary: Is SiteGround Right For You?
SiteGround offers an interesting mix of strength and weakness in our benchmark tests. While they have an excellent WPBench score of 8.3/10, their regional and global TTFB response time speeds are below average. Considering the premium renewal prices, their uptime is not matching with over 1 hour of downtimes in a year. The load handling is good but not the industry best to use.
| User Type | Score | Key Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Personal Blogs | 7/10 | Good server resources but slow TTFB response times may impact SEO. Mostly good for content focused blogs where page speed isn’t critical. |
| Small Business | 6/10 | Acceptable for regional (USA) audience websites but poor global TTFB performance limits international reach. Not recommended for sites with global customers. |
| eCommerce | 5/10 | Below-average TTFB response times will impact conversion rates and customer experience. Better alternatives exist for online stores. |
| Enterprise | 4/10 | Inadequate global performance and uptime metrics for enterprise requirements. Resource limits may present scaling challenges. |
| Developers | 8/10 | Excellent server resources with Git integration, staging environments, and WordPress-specific development tools make it ideal for development work. |
verified SiteGround Performance Data
Verified SiteGround Performance Data (12 Month + Q1 2025 3-Month Averages)
| Metric | Jan – Dec 2024 Avg | Jan – Mar 2025 Avg | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB (ms) | 510ms | 608ms | +19.2% 🔼 |
| Uptime (%) | 99.99% | 99.94% | -0.05% 🔽 |
| Load Test (ms/users) | 147ms | 147ms | 0% ⟹ |
| Global TTFB (ms) | 886ms | 886ms | 0% ⟹ |
| WPBench Score | 8.3/10 | 8.3/10 | 0% ⟹ |
Note: For TTFB and Global TTFB, lower values are better. For uptime and WPBench Score, higher values are better.
SiteGround Performance Metrics
Based on continuous monitoring compared against industry benchmarks
Average TTFB
Uptime
Load Test
WPBench Score
Global TTFB
How SiteGround Compares to Most-Searched Alternatives
Based on Google data, these are the hosting providers which are getting compared with SiteGround
| Hosting Provider | TTFB | Uptime | Load Test | Global TTFB | WPBench |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiteGround | 510ms | 99.99% | 147ms | 886ms | 8.3/10 |
| Hostinger | 474ms | 100% | 256ms | 503ms | 8.0/10 |
| Bluehost | 516ms | 99.99% | 131ms | 394ms | 4.0/10 |
| WP Engine | 354ms | 100% | 19ms | 293ms | 5.9/10 |
| Cloudways | 438ms | 100% | 128ms | 444ms | 3.7/10 |
| A2 Hosting | 435ms | 99.99% | 44ms | 527ms | 3.4/10 |
Key Comparison Insights:
- Server Hardware: SiteGround leads with the highest WPBench score (8.3/10), closely followed by Hostinger
- Response Time: WP Engine offers significantly better TTFB metrics both domestically and globally
- Load Handling: WP Engine and A2 Hosting excel at load handling traffic spikes with superior load test results
- Global Performance: SiteGround struggles with global performance compared to all alternatives
What We Like
-
✓
Excellent Server Resources
WPBench score of 8.3/10 indicates top-tier server hardware and processing capabilities.
-
✓
Reliable Uptime
99.99% uptime with 1 hour 18 minutes of downtime in a year.
-
✓
Decent Load Handling
Notable improvements in load handling capabilities compared to previous years.
-
✓
Modern Control Panel
Intuitive Site Tools interface with WordPress-specific features and staging.
-
✓
Comprehensive Security
Robust security features including WAF, real-time monitoring and free SSL.
Limitations to Consider
-
✗
Below Average Response Times
TTFB of 510ms falls below the average in industry benchmarks, potentially offering slow user experience for visitors.
-
✗
Poor Global Performance
Global TTFB of 886ms indicates significant long loading time for international audiences.
-
✗
Average Load Handling
Load test performance of 147ms is merely average compared to competitors.
-
✗
Renewal Price Increases
Very Biggest jump in hosting renewal costs.
-
✗
Resource Limitations
Lower-tier plans have stricter resource caps that can impact growing sites.
The Hosting Verdict: SiteGround
SiteGround presents a mixed performance profile with excellent WPBench scores and reliability but disappointing response times, both for regional and global audiences.
✓ Best For:
- Small to medium business websites with regional audiences
- Developer environments requiring strong server resources
- Content-heavy websites where reliability is crucial, but make sure to know about thier CPU limits
- WordPress sites focused management tools
✗ Not Recommended For:
- Global audience websites requiring fast international access
- Performance-critical applications where every millisecond counts
- High-traffic sites that need exceptional load handling
- Budget-conscious users concerned about renewal pricing
Mohan Raj, founder of Hostingstep.com is passionate about WordPress and specializes in server management and speed optimization. With experience across top hosting providers, he launched Hostingstep.com to deliver honest, data-backed hosting reviews, helping website owners focus on growing their business instead of troubleshooting websites.